Been thinking lately

I almost hate to ask, but what is the "number one problem?"

Guess I've firmly established a non-serious reputation. :)

But I'm convinced that overpopulation is the most serious problem today, and is directly responsible for environmental problems (such as global warming), famine, education problems, wars, and poor customer service.
 
about life, especially life after FIRE. More specifically, I have been thinking about what I really want out of life and what is really important. After all, my life to date has been taken up with marriage, family, getting educated, and making money. The first two are of enduring importance to me, but I can't say that much of getting educated is, and that goes double for most of the making money part.

So I am left with a sensee that much of my time is taken up by things that don't really matter much in the grand scheme of things.

I'm surprised no one's tried to "save" you yet. You're really asking for them to come out of hiding speaking like that, so be careful! They're like vultures, some of em. Especially here in Arkansas.
 
azanon said:
I'm surprised no one's tried to "save" you yet.  You're really asking for them to come out of hiding speaking like that, so be careful!   They're like vultures, some of em.  Especially here in Arkansas.

Oh, probably someone already has. Most of these ruminations started after listening to a sermon at Mass last Sunday. I have just been deliberately keeping religion out of it.
 
Brewer said in part: "I guess I am surprised at how few here have done much volunteering, etc. after achieving FIRE. Its probably partly a funtion of who we are. After all, most of us were motivated to do this by a disgust with organizational nonsense, so the idea of voluntarily jumping back into a potentially similar situation is obviously not going to work."

Well I expect to do a good bit of volunteering work when I retire. Part of that is being married to a gal who will never stop being a teacher. We go on exotic vacations to Fiji, Rarotonga and parts of the South Pacific and she visits schools and makes friends we still correspond with. We work with the Heifer Project these days and I was a Big Brother for 9 years and long list of other things. My church alone would eat up 100% of my time if I let it.
One thing I wish everyone, especially those who have toiled in corporate structures, is to experience being part of a voluntary organization. It can really be great. I remember years ago in a meeting of Big Brothers they asked for a volunteer for some crappy assignment and all 22 of us present volunteered. I realized I wasn't at work.
I think balance is the issue. If I don't volunteer at all I mentally and socially "shrivel up" and if I volunteer too much I burn out.
But I really like the initial post because people need to think and feel their way into retirement rather than have it happen and just mentally be like the "deer caught in the headlignts", reactive and clueles about what is happening to them.
 
Oh, probably someone already has.  Most of these ruminations started after listening to a sermon at Mass last Sunday.  I have just been deliberately keeping religion out of it.

Sorry, i'm just a little bitter about it, cant you tell?  Almost my entire extended family is christain conservative, and just about everyone i work with is too.   Heck, i also attend and am a member of a baptist church, just to keep up an appropriate appearances.   I kinda enjoy the singing and inspirational messages despite me not believing them.

But I could not realistically be open about me being personally agnostic where i live, to my workmates and to most of my immediate and extended family (i have told my wife).  I am confident i would be both excommuniated in various ways, and discriminated against in the workplace.  This is to say nothing of the prayer groups that would probably start so that my soul might be saved.    

I guess I have a taste for what it feels like to be in a particulat group of people that are discriminated against.  

Sorry, hope you dont mind the hijak.
 
TromboneAl said:
Guess I've firmly established a non-serious reputation. :)

But I'm convinced that overpopulation is the most serious problem today, and is directly responsible for environmental problems (such as global warming), famine, education problems, wars, and poor customer service.

My great uncle, deceased now for about 10 years, believed strongly as you do and worked hard for zero population growth organizations. It does seem as if population growth is not on the radar as it was 20 or so years ago. People aren't going to have much of an appetite for talking about zpg as they feel the effects supporting the "largest generation", the baby boomers, by a smaller generation.
 
TromboneAl said:
But I'm convinced that overpopulation is the most serious problem today, and is directly responsible for...poor customer service.

Say what? :confused:

Somewhat related to this thread digression is a factoid that I saw on Frontline a few weeks ago:  in 1950 Europe had three times the population of Africa;  in 2050 Africa will have three times the population of Europe.
 
...poor customer service.

Well, yes, that was partly a joke. But it's possible that increases in population make our high-volume low service economy possible. If the population of the U.S. were half what it is today, would it be easier or faster to get to a live person when calling a company? Debatable.
 
brewer12345 said:
....So I am left with a sense that much of my time is taken up by things that don't really matter much in the grand scheme of things...  What other things might I pursue?...  I don't know where this leaves me, except that I know I am unlikely to figure out what is right for me until after I get FIREd.  I am curious if anyone else has grappled with this sort of thing.  So, anybody else following this path?

Most excellent post/question Brewer.  I think about it frequently.  The revelation that I simply don't have enough hours in the day to fit my job into was not necessarily a positive one.  I guess that may be what keeps me on the path to FI.

Questions abound, though.  Should I ditch what I'm doing now in a couple of years, and find some part time work?  Should I stick it out until I can walk away for good?  Will I think I'm wasting my time if it's not spent doing some constructive.

Sheesh.  Pass me a cold one....
 
TromboneAl said:
If the population of the U.S. were half what it is today, would it be easier or faster to get to a live person when calling a company?  Debatable.

All the customer service reps I talk to are in India, which has a much greater population than the US. Problem solved :)

In any case, this planet has an interesting way of self-healing. If the population even becomes unsustainable, the planet simply kills a bunch of us off and starts over again (perhaps with organisms better adapted to whatever soup we create).
 
Of course, it's my understanding that a person in the U.S. consumes 250 times the resources of a person in a third world country, so overpopulation is a simplification of the problem. Not that I'm for living in a grass hut and carrying my water from the local stream to be boiled by burning dried cow dung, but we could mix in a few less 10 litre diesel F-750 crew cabs into our lives.
 
brewer12345 said:
about life, especially life after FIRE.  More specifically, I have been thinking about what I really want out of life and what is really important.  After all, my life to date has been taken up with marriage, family, getting educated, and making money.  The first two are of enduring importance to me, but I can't say that much of getting educated is, and that goes double for most of the making money part.

So I am left with a sensee that much of my time is taken up by things that don't really matter much in the grand scheme of things.  I have responsibilities to my family, and I am the sole breadwinner, so I have to forestall doing more worthwhile, but less lucrative things until I have built my hoard to escape velocity.  But eventually, I will have completed my indentured servitude and have the freedom to pursue other things.

What other things might I pursue?  Obviously spending more time with family is high on the list.  Plus travel, de-stressing, better lifestyle, etc.  However, when I consider how much human misery there is in the world (to say nothing of animal cruelty, environmental destruction, etc.), I'm not sure I would be happy just puttering around doing things that are fun.

I don't know where this leaves me, except that I know I am unlikely to figure out what is right for me until after I get FIREd.  I am curious if anyone else has grappled with this sort of thing.  So, anybody else following this path?
Are you trying to figure out "Waddya gonna DO all day?"  Don't worry, your FIRE plan won't survive its first contact with reality.

Speaking of kids, I'm beginning to think that parenting expands to fill all available FIRE time.  When our kid's in school we have a few hours off, but when she's home then things tend to revolve around either getting the list finished or hanging around keeping an eye on things.  Then there's field trips, classroom tutoring, the PTA, the school council, and so on.  It's kinda hard to be digging wells in Honduras when you have school-age kids in the family.  It can be done but it would definitely require putting your goals ahead of the family's school selection.  At this point I feel that "true freedom" for adult activities & travel seems to happen AFTER we become empty-nesters.

You probably have a "To Do With My Life" list.  I'm a big fan of spending the first month of FIRE catching up on sleep & quiet contemplation and then deciding what I'd like to do with that list.  Paul Terhorst advises changing nothing for the first two years just to make sure that you don't fall too deeply into a bunch of new "Try It" activities that leave you no time for re-evaluating a big life change.

While you could FIRE to emulate Mother Teresa, I suspect that your choices will gravitate toward activities that bring you personal satisfaction.  Whether they're regarded as "fun" or as sheer penury by the rest of society won't affect your decision.  Hopefully marriage & family will stay near the top of your list-- if not then both are headed for a big surprise-- but if you're concerned by world misery then eventually you'll find a way to do something about it.  It might happen by joining a large charitable organization, by going back to work in a large govt bureaucracy, or by coming up with your own personal initiative.

But it's awful darn hard to make those plans while you're slaving away in a cubicle.  Give it time after your retire and these things will no doubt work themselves out.  If nothing else, by retiring you'll already have eliminated a lot of the world's personal misery for yourself.  That seems worthy of a few afternoon naps.

I'm still waiting for the day when I get up and feel like all I'm doing is "puttering".  Usually I'm dealing with adolescent angst, a savage backyard jungle, crumbling infrastructure, neighbor problems, or just plain crises.  None of those are any fun, especially when the surf is up, but it all gets taken care of.  If I wasn't happy then I'd be doing things differently.  When I'm feeling really sorry for myself I think back to all those Tuesday 7:30 AM department head meetings, and suddenly my FIRE life seems worthwhile!
 
TromboneAl said:
Guess I've firmly established a non-serious reputation. :)
I think it was that photo you posted of your chaperonage at your kid's graduation party...

TromboneAl said:
But I'm convinced that overpopulation is the most serious problem today, and is directly responsible for environmental problems (such as global warming), famine, education problems, wars, and poor customer service.
You don't strike me as the sort of person who pulls chocks & moves to central Idaho when he can see his next-door neighbors from the edge of his property. SG can probably tell you that humans have been ruining our cultures & local environments for thousands of years, even before call centers were invented. Now that we have the Internet & outsourcing we can just do a much more effective job of it.

I think that we can all provide enough resources to support at least the current population and maybe another 50% if we could be more efficient about distributing it. For example, I'd have a hard time explaining America's crop-subsidy payments to starving Africans. While I think that a lot of the world's women are still seeking effective birth control, I'm not a fan of population-control schemes. When we make better use of what we waste, I bet we'd even find a way to make a profit from it...
 
Well it is disconcerting to think that 50 years ago, when I was born, the world population was 2.8 billion and now it is 6 billion.
 
Martha said:
Well it is disconcerting to think that 50 years ago, when I was born, the world population was 2.8 billion and now it is 6 billion.

Just think of it as a larger scale version of the internet bubble.   Someday it will pop, and it will be ugly on an unprecedented scale, but then things will reach a new equilibrium.

As a general rule of thumb, exponential growth is not sustainable long-term:

worldpop.jpg
 
Martha said:
Well it is disconcerting to think that 50 years ago, when I was born, the world population was 2.8 billion and now it is 6 billion.

That is disconcerting. 6 billion people, and Nords & I are having problems finding a good
reliable small contractor. :D
 
This of course is a good thing.

Skipping the scarcity of fix-it persons - page 18 of Bernstein's Birth of Plenty - has a per capita GDP chart thru the ages - crudely similar in shape to pop growth. He has about 386 pages explaining - in his own way - why this may not be such a bad thing.

Club of Rome be dammed.

Capitilism uber alles. Today America - tomorrow: Walmart, Coke, credit cards and Mickey D for all.

Heh, heh, heh, heh, heh - that's five!
 
unclemick2 said:
Skipping the scarcity of fix-it persons - page 18 of Bernstein's Birth of Plenty - has a per capita GDP chart thru the ages - crudely similar in shape to pop growth.

But the population growth of the developed world is slowing down. I'm not sure the people of developing nations, where all the growth is, are going to be buying a lot of Big Macs.
 
unclemick2 said:
This of course is a good thing.

Skipping the scarcity of fix-it persons - page 18 of Bernstein's Birth of Plenty - has a per capita GDP chart thru the ages - crudely similar in shape to pop growth. He has about 386 pages explaining - in his own way - why this may not be such a bad thing.

Club of Rome be dammed.

Capitilism uber alles. Today America - tomorrow: Walmart, Coke, credit cards and Mickey D for all.

Heh, heh, heh, heh, heh - that's five!
Well oddly enough, that is one of the thoughts Friedmann advances in "The World is Flat".  Send those loser call center jobs to India cause there they are creating a well to do young middle class of gigantic proportion.  Many of these newly minted middle classites at one time wanted to go to the USA due to the lack of opportunity in the homeland. Ah, but no more, riches are here at home. But alas, no stuff to buy with new riches.  Hello USA, can you hear the opportunity?

BTW unclemick, you really are Alan Greenspan aren't you?  :confused:
 
Nope - easy Al takes himself serious.

I've never seen - heh, heh, heh, in any of his speeches.

Could have missed it though.
 
"Been thinking lately about life, especially life after FIRE.  More specifically, I have been thinking about what I really want out of life and what is really important. "

I wanted to bring up the volunteer idea once again. -- For the first couple of years after I retired, I felt the "worthy cause that I wanted to donate to" was me (!). I had just finished 15 years of working 60-80 hours a week, and I needed to decompress and discover myself again. Hence, my travel, reading and doing artwork.

However, I am an industrious sort, and enthusiastic by nature, so before I knew it, I was volunteering to teach ESL (English as a Second Language) in Mexico, and helping local businesses make a post and note card business. My husband, Billy, is an amazing volunteer, and logs in countless hours. He coached a women's basketball team to the finals when we lived in Mexico, arranged for and imported an electronic scoreboard for the Chapala, Mexico gym, and raised thousands of $$ to build new tennis courts for the city of Chapala, and this was just in the first few years of retirement!

Everyone is different.

I definitely agree with the guy who talked about driving his elderly neighbor places that she needed to go, and I value that contribution to the world deeply. Personally? I'd love to find the cure for some dreaded disease just for humanity's sake, but I might have to settle for being an authentic friend who takes time to listen to and care for those who need it in my personal life. -- that's a form of volunteering or giving back.

And you know?  I'll drink to that!

The best to you all ways,
Akaisha
RetireEarlyLifestyle.com
 
azanon said:
But I could not realistically be open about me being personally agnostic where i live, to my workmates and to most of my immediate and extended family (i have told my wife).  I am confident i would be both excommuniated in various ways, and discriminated against in the workplace.  This is to say nothing of the prayer groups that would probably start so that my soul might be saved.

Any of you folks considering cashing out an overpriced house in San Francisco or Greenwich, or maybe a condo in SoHo, and moving to a cheaper area in the "Sunbelt"? If so, maybe you should frame this post of Azanon, and hang it on the wall in your bathroom where you will see it every day.

A lot of people who left places like Arkansas wouldn't go back even at gunpoint. Wait till you high falutin' Yankee atheist commies get there. The only thing blue you will encounter is your wife, when it hits her what you have done to her life.

And I bet y’all thought Deliverance was just a movie!

ha
 
HaHa said:
Any of you folks considering cashing out an overpriced house in San Francisco or Greenwich, or maybe a condo in SoHo, and moving to a cheaper area in the "Sunbelt"? If so, maybe you should frame this post of Azanon, and hang it on the wall in your bathroom where you will see it every day.

A lot of people who left places like Arkansas wouldn't go back even at gunpoint. Wait till you high falutin' Yankee atheist commies get there. The only thing blue you will encounter is your wife, when it hits her what you have done to her life.

And I bet y’all thought Deliverance was just a movie!

ha

You raise a very valid point, and one that was touched upon in the thread addressing financial independence or friends.  The population density and property values in less desirable geographical locations is indicative of the fact that less people want to live in those places.  Thus, although the cost of living in such places are much lower than in more desireable geographic locations, the true cost in terms of friends, culture, family, and similar considerations could be much higher than the cost of living savings as compared to living in a more desirable location.  Understandably, the foregoing analysis is one of personal preference, because the factors involved are measurable only by subjective standards.
 
Exactly.  Much is made here of the fact that financial independence allows you to live in a lower cost of living area.  One of the reasons an area has a low cost of living reflects the quality of, or well-nigh complete lack of job opportunities in the area.  As someone who is financially independent, you are free from this constraint.

However, the other factor that makes an area more affordable is, simply, the fact that few people really want to live there.  Thus the conundrum for those of us who could afford a low cost of living area, but would struggle mightily if we want to stay in our high-priced urban enclaves.

Jay_Gatsby said:
The population density and property values in less desirable geographical locations is indicative of the fact that less people want to live in those places.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom