audreyh1
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
I think the SEC yield is a valid way to compare bond funds at any given moment in time, and can give you an indication of the future return for a bond fund assuming a stable interest rate environment. But there are times where the distribution yield is higher or lower depending on interest rate changes. So I can't really explain more than you have in your post here.We need Audrey here to give us her reasoned approach to interpreting SEC yield vs other measures. I personally learned on this forum that SEC yield was the best measure of yield for a fund, as opposed to trailing market yield. The SEC yield plus factoring in duration is the best measure of a bond fund to inform decisions. In a rising intetest rate environment, like we are in now, the shorter the duration the better and SEC yield is always higher than TTM , and a more accurate measure of yields going forward. In a declining interest rate environment SEC yield is always less than TTM and a more realistic estimation of yield going forward.
I agree that the SEC yield being higher than the distribution yield is common in a rising interest rate environment and indicates that the distribution yield will rise in the future.
For the duration - that is an indication of how quickly a fund might recover from interest rate changes. If you are holding bond funds for a long time, but have some concerns about drawing form them, one way to handle it is to have a mix of durations - say cash/MM, short-term bond funds, and intermediate bond funds.
Last edited: