Hi OverThinkMuchMost of my assets are at Vanguard, which doesn't have much in the way of tools. Another example is my Roth IRA, which didn't lose much then suddenly shot upwards. Anything very profitable is considered volatile and therefore risky by most defintions.
I couldn't find Tesla's standard deviation on Yahoo or Morningstar, but I think it illustrates the point. It has a 5 year standard deviation of 57%. Did it ever lose 57% in the past 5 years? No - the volatility is based on upwards moves - and that, I claim is not risk.
Tesla Inc (NASDAQ: TSLA) Stock Report
If we have two stocks who develop like
a)
10 -> 12 -> 15 -> 19 -> 24 -> 31
b)
10 -> 12 -> 14 -> 16 -> 18 -> 19
None of them went down, but both have a standard deviation and volatility.
c)
10 -> 9 -> 8 -> 7 -> 6 -> 5 -> 4
It goes down all the time.
It is also having standard deviation and volatility.
Maybe you are not looking for something that measures investment risk, but for something that predicts investment results or prevents losses from happening.
A lot of people may disagree.
My opinion, risk management, risk measurement, performance attribution, benchmarking. All this stuff has not been invented to prevent losses from happening. That stuff helps to describe the characteristics of a portfolio and it can explain afterwards why the portfolio under - or outperformed a benchmark in a certain period of time.
In addition it helps to value Options and Warrants.
Regarding upward moves.
It is a risk, the risk of not being invested when it goes up.