Posting this because the referenced article points up a number of things that I had never heard about diabetes.
Since "everything that's on the internet MUST be true"... I wonder if anyone here might believe differently.
In any case, maybe the article is worth a read.
Sugar's Role in Diabetes - Better Medicine
A small excerpt here, but more interesting stuff in the article:
Since "everything that's on the internet MUST be true"... I wonder if anyone here might believe differently.
In any case, maybe the article is worth a read.
Sugar's Role in Diabetes - Better Medicine
A small excerpt here, but more interesting stuff in the article:
Assuming an elevated blood sugar level is the cause of diabetes is like assuming that coughing is the cause of pneumonia. And not only does sugar itself not cause diabetes, there is no convincing evidence that sugar causes other problems that it has been blamed for, such as hyperactivity. Many medical myths develop along these lines.
Dispelling this myth regarding sugar may correct the assumption many people have about the development of diabetes — that people with this illness have brought it on themselves by eating the wrong kinds of foods. Although it is true that avoiding obesity may reduce the chances of developing type 2 diabetes, the specific types of foods you eat may play little or no known role. And not all persons with diabetes are overweight — that's another myth. For these patients, heredity and perhaps other undiscovered factors are more important.