RunningBum
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2007
- Messages
- 13,244
Without getting into all of the details, my parents may need fairly considerable financial support in a few years. I've been thinking about how to manage the tax hit, especially since it may come while I'm still trying for an ACA subsidy, and certainly trying to do more Roth conversions.
They are in a low tax bracket, so I can gift them appreciated shares of a mutual fund, and let them incur the tax liability when they need to share. I'm thinking to start this year, so I can gift $30K a year (15 to each parent, and I'm not married) and they'll have it when they need it.
Then I thought, I should ask them to put me as beneficiary, so I get anything they don't use back. Would I get stepped up basis then? It wasn't my intent to take such advantage to avoid LTCGs for myself, but if it's a legal loophole, why not? My expectation would be that they use it all, but if they don't I definitely want it back. It would be in a new account for them, so it wouldn't muddy up any other beneficiary settings they have on other accounts. And of course they can name whoever they want, but I'm sure they'd understand and name me. My brother has full power of attorney on their financial accounts and I'm sure he'd agree to this.
So I just want to know, is this an allowable loophole, to gift MF shares, and get a stepped up basis if I inherit them back? If they can't do it specifically on those shares, what if they sold them when they received the gift, took the LTCG at the likely 0% rate for their status, and invested in a different fund that I might eventually inherit?
They are in a low tax bracket, so I can gift them appreciated shares of a mutual fund, and let them incur the tax liability when they need to share. I'm thinking to start this year, so I can gift $30K a year (15 to each parent, and I'm not married) and they'll have it when they need it.
Then I thought, I should ask them to put me as beneficiary, so I get anything they don't use back. Would I get stepped up basis then? It wasn't my intent to take such advantage to avoid LTCGs for myself, but if it's a legal loophole, why not? My expectation would be that they use it all, but if they don't I definitely want it back. It would be in a new account for them, so it wouldn't muddy up any other beneficiary settings they have on other accounts. And of course they can name whoever they want, but I'm sure they'd understand and name me. My brother has full power of attorney on their financial accounts and I'm sure he'd agree to this.
So I just want to know, is this an allowable loophole, to gift MF shares, and get a stepped up basis if I inherit them back? If they can't do it specifically on those shares, what if they sold them when they received the gift, took the LTCG at the likely 0% rate for their status, and invested in a different fund that I might eventually inherit?