Well, we have a few things going for us.
First, the author first advanced his apocalyptic vision in 1993. Of course that was followed shortly by 1995,1996,1997,1998 and 1999. The greatest 5 year stretch in stock market history. So there is hope!
Secondly, his policy prescriptions have zero chance of ever seeing the light of day in our lifetimes.
But I think there are some kernels of insight that I agree with to wit:
Our trade imbalance is unsustainable. Something has got to give sometime.
Currency devaluation will not solve the problem. Our foreign creditors will not let us get away with it forever.
The idea of a creditor cartel is a unique concept. I agree that the avalanche is likely to be started by some little country on the edge of things that decides to jump the gun by sliding out of U.S. debt instruments before everybody else. Makes sense to me.
The idea that our foreign creditors will be bought out by the Fed in a desperate effort to forestall the avalanche also makes sense. The credit risk will be shifted from China/Japan and the cartel to Mr. and Mrs. America through desperate Fed intervention in the debt markets. The Board of Governors will be under tremendous pressure to support the buck in the event of an avalanche. I doubt they have the guts to resist.
I agree that somebody should be working on contingency plans to prevent the flight of capital in the event of a dollar panic.
I agree that the world has changed and that we need to revisit Adam Smith's free trade theories. There are winners and losers. The American consumer may be better off with cheap Chinese shirts. But is America better off?
I agree with Bill Gross who says we are now living on the kindness of strangers. Our fate is no longer in our own hands.
I am not ready for a new Marshall PLan to reorder the global economic architecture. I am not ready for higher taxes, a gutting of social security and other social programs. And good God, how much more can we spend on Defense?
I think we will probably muddle through somehow as we usually do.