JoeWras
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2012
- Messages
- 11,713
I recently got a "survey monkey" request from Treasury Direct.
They said:
I took the survey and it is very focused on the migration process. They did ask a free-form question though: "What features would make it worth migrating from TreasuryDirect to a new Treasury supported platform?"
I gave them some ideas.
Later, though, they asked this question: " Imagine the following pieces of information do NOT transfer from TreasuryDirect to the new platform. How would you feel?"
I think this is a window into what they are considering. For example, there were questions about how I'd expect bank accounts to be linked, and what to do with the "C&I" (which is the zero percent account).
The migration sounds like it may be messy. A few things they ask about were:
- Familiarity with ID.me
- How would I "feel" about having to re-enter bank links
- Same for beneficiaries
- How much history should migrate
- and a few other things
It really looks like they want to get rid of C&I, and I presume have some direct link to the bank account.
One more thing. They had a separate question asking how I'd feel if they migrated everything except savings bonds.
It should be interesting when it happens, for a few reasons. 1) It is the government, 2) The current site is so old, anything new has to be drastic difference which will always cause a kerfuffle, even if the new site is better.
As much as I could, I made it clear I don't want to have to mess with their ridiculous process for adding bank accounts. Either transfer it over, or make it easy.
They said:
The US Treasury is building a new experience for customers to purchase and manage government securities and is seeking input on the experiences from current customers. If you are interested in participating in research that will inform and improve the future of purchasing government securities, please take this brief survey “Migrating to a new platform”, through SurveyMonkey
I took the survey and it is very focused on the migration process. They did ask a free-form question though: "What features would make it worth migrating from TreasuryDirect to a new Treasury supported platform?"
I gave them some ideas.
Later, though, they asked this question: " Imagine the following pieces of information do NOT transfer from TreasuryDirect to the new platform. How would you feel?"
I think this is a window into what they are considering. For example, there were questions about how I'd expect bank accounts to be linked, and what to do with the "C&I" (which is the zero percent account).
The migration sounds like it may be messy. A few things they ask about were:
- Familiarity with ID.me
- How would I "feel" about having to re-enter bank links
- Same for beneficiaries
- How much history should migrate
- and a few other things
It really looks like they want to get rid of C&I, and I presume have some direct link to the bank account.
One more thing. They had a separate question asking how I'd feel if they migrated everything except savings bonds.
It should be interesting when it happens, for a few reasons. 1) It is the government, 2) The current site is so old, anything new has to be drastic difference which will always cause a kerfuffle, even if the new site is better.
As much as I could, I made it clear I don't want to have to mess with their ridiculous process for adding bank accounts. Either transfer it over, or make it easy.