lazygood4nothinbum
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2006
- Messages
- 3,895
Fundamentalists, of whatever creed, are dangerous (and usually misogynistic)
true even with what would have been otherwise seemingly to me innocuous new age thinking. i've mentioned before that i had a friend who was so convinced that he determined everything that happened to him in life that when he found out he had a disease he decided that his "higher self" must have determined that it was time to die and so he did.
as well, i recently lost a very old friend, also to fundemental new ageism. among other outlandish assertions, she told me that my mother's alzheimer's was her own damned fault; that she wouldn't have gotten it if she didn't want it. of course she never noticed that when trouble came her way i simply offered support instead of attack.
oddly, intelligence level was not the deciding factor in who went over that edge. my dear dead friend had an i.q. of over 135 and though i never considered my now dead-to-me friend very bright, at least she used to be a caring and thoughtful person. but when i confronted her recently on another matter she said to me (i'm paraphrasing): "i have a message to deliver; i don't have to be nice." ick.
during another one of her brilliant other-worldly observations, she said to me that i'm gay because when i died last time (rather presumptuous, don't ya think?) i didn't stay dead long enough or some such crap to make her feel superior for being hetero. well, at least she didn't stone me.