urn2bfree
Full time employment: Posting here.
- Joined
- Feb 14, 2011
- Messages
- 853
I feel a little lonely suggesting the RE agent be paid what she has requested. If the broker and the RE company appear on any of the contracts I'm sure the broker would receive the 1% and pay the agent. Now, if the broker is on the contract every signature, every part of the deal, all the paperwork that goes to the State, city, changing ownership records, mtge contracts etc....the RE agent and broker have to check them for accuracy since they are liable if anything is wrong. If I were the agent I would ask that everything be torn up and send a certified letter to buyer and seller removing any responsibility for anything in the sale. The real problem here is that fees should have been discussed and disclosed and understood up front. But.....since 1% is so much less than 6%.....I think the RE agent didn't feel that a friend of a friend would dispute what I believe is a very reasonable fee. Now, again, I never had a RE liscense, no RE agents in the family.....I just have bought and sold a lot of property and NEVER knew any agent to work for less than 1% if his/her or the brokers company name appeared on the contract. Am I wrong? I'd love to hear from RE agents if I'm incorrect.
Other than tradition-(the last refuge of the indefensible) Why should the reimbursement be based on a percentage of the value of the property? The people who perpetuate this system of basing their fees on percentages of things that end up equalling ridiculous wages on a per hour basis will keep picking our pockets as long as we let them.
Why can't we pay people a reasonable hourly wage for their services, calculated by how much work they actually do -based on the value of their labor -not based on the value of MY property?!?
Sent from my iPad using Early Retirement Forum