BUM said:Financially...married a squirrel
Free nuts!
BUM said:Financially...married a squirrel
sgeeeee said:I took a job working for Satan. Having never worked for an evil demon from h#ll before, I did not know how to deal with the situation. Over a period of about 2 or 3 years I tried to deal with the Prince of Darkness in various ways before I decided that I needed a change of scenery.
Meadbh said:Saved madly for big downpayment on small house; paid mortgage off in 18 months.
Meadbh said:I have come to realize that my parents, neither of whom finished high school, were two very smart people. Thanks Mom & Dad!
Rich_in_Tampa said:Neat story.
Anyone who saved money as a resident is smarter than I was. All my spare time was spent moonlighting trying to keep the loans under control.
Meadbh said:Rich, you had SPARE TIME as a resident?
No spare time = no time to spend money. Work, work, work, sleep, work, work.......
retire@40 said:Then while I was watching a Sugar Ray Leonard fight on TV (I think the Leonard-Hearns fight in 1981), the commentator stated how Leonard saved every single dollar he had earned as a pro fighter and would only live on the investment income. I decided then that I was going to try to save as much as I could and try doing the same thing.
Glad to know I wasn't the only one! Actually, I was really intrigued by the lifestyle of the financially independent in the 1800s. Even though a lot of the activities were "homebody" in nature, people took advantage to study and learn and pursue science, art, nature observation, etc. Things I like to do today. Maybe I'm just an anachronism LOL!Andy said:"Anyway - I had this girlish fantasy of having "X pounds a year" and being able to live a life of leisure in the great 1800s tradition - as modest as it might be. Little did I know that true financial independence would work out for me. "
Audrey, I had to comment on this, because I had this fantasy too. :
Not necessarily. Financial independence came from inheritance (not from working), and English law at the time did not discriminate against women equally as inheritors - unlike some other countries. Many women inherited financial independence.shiny said:I read all the Jane Austen novels when I was young. At the time rather than think that I needed 5000 pounds a year, etc. I thought I needed a job!! Those women didn't have one and had to rely on men!
audreyh1 said:Not necessarily. Financial independence came from inheritance (not from working), and English law at the time did not discriminate against women equally as inheritors - unlike some other countries. Many women inherited financial independence.
In those books it was all about trying to gain financial advantage through marriage. Men with little means would need to find a woman that had a decent inheritance just as often as the other way around.
Oh, you'll still be productive, but now you'll also be the exec in charge of defining & improving your productivity.scrinch said:... and I'm still internally trying to come to grips with the fact that soon I might not be doing anything "productive." The concept of early retirement sounds very appealing to the ears and brain, but the genes are still struggling with the it! The genes still want me to be preparing for the next winter.
Yes, I know - they had to find husbands because their father was poor or some twist in the inheritance rules. Men had the same problem back then! Inherit, marry some money, or (god forbid) get a job. A job usually meant clergy or somehow obtaining a military commission.shiny said:I'm specifically refering to the women in Sense and Sensibility and Pride and Prejudice who had to find a husband or be poor and pitiful! My parents were poor and I knew that I wouldn't be inheriting anything - therefore I needed to prepare myself for a job!
You REALLY need to redefine what it means to be "productive". Are you only productive because someone else pays you? I think not. You can be as productive - i.e. produce as much stuff - as you want. You can expend effort on thing you think are worthwhile.scrinch said:I'm still internally trying to come to grips with the fact that soon I might not be doing anything "productive."
unclemick2 said:Ah yes Romance.
Back in the day - I would have never have left the Space Program for a job making widgets - no matter what the pay.
You REALLY need to redefine what it means to be "productive". Are you only productive because someone else pays you?