ncbill
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
One other concern I might point out for higher NW folks “struggling” with thier RE decisions, the old saying the bigger they are, the harder they fall can haunt many of us. Yes, it is relative, but in real $$, it can feel more impactful. Eg. using a 4% WR, if a $1m portfolio loses 20% that is an $8k hit on the WR while it’s a $64K hit on $8m. While both are relatively significant, I might argue the $64k hit might hurt more psychologically, thus often adding some more tension/OMY analysis to the higher NW guys. Just another perspective.
AFAIK he didn't specify the composition of the IRA, but if it is 100% equities that means his asset allocation is ~75% equities, ~25% fixed income/cash.
Given his spending, which he feels needs to be sustained for now, I'd suggest flipping that ratio by making sure the IRA is rebalanced to $3-$4 million in (shorter duration) fixed income.
I.e. following the "rising equity glide path" approach in order to mitigate sequence-of-return risk.
Last edited: