LOL!
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2005
- Messages
- 10,252
Yep, no one calculates these things the same way. I have several positions that have not changed since early 2009. They are Vanguard products, so they have the exact same return YTD as the numbers on the Vanguard web site. I calculate the performance using MS Money, so I believe it is reasonably legit.
That said, I am about 0.5% YTD behind one of my benchmarks, but about 0.3% ahead of another. Now why is that? Some tinkering suggests it is drag from cash and short-term bonds.
Benchmarks that I like to use are the Vanguard Target Retirement funds, LifeStrategy funds and some DFA balanced funds like DGSIX (a 60/40 global fund). The Vanguard LifeStrategy Moderate Growth fund has a 60/40 asset allocation, too. My portfolio has fewer equities than that and more short-term fixed income, so it is not an exact match.
And yes, I can pull out the account with the 20% annualized IRR which is a completely valid number, but it isn't the full portfolio nor is it a YTD number. (Actually I think Quicken makes it difficult to do a YTD number, so the IRR always looks better. I think they do this on purpose so that folks think they are doing better than reality and thus have a warm feeling for Quicken.)
That said, I am about 0.5% YTD behind one of my benchmarks, but about 0.3% ahead of another. Now why is that? Some tinkering suggests it is drag from cash and short-term bonds.
Benchmarks that I like to use are the Vanguard Target Retirement funds, LifeStrategy funds and some DFA balanced funds like DGSIX (a 60/40 global fund). The Vanguard LifeStrategy Moderate Growth fund has a 60/40 asset allocation, too. My portfolio has fewer equities than that and more short-term fixed income, so it is not an exact match.
And yes, I can pull out the account with the 20% annualized IRR which is a completely valid number, but it isn't the full portfolio nor is it a YTD number. (Actually I think Quicken makes it difficult to do a YTD number, so the IRR always looks better. I think they do this on purpose so that folks think they are doing better than reality and thus have a warm feeling for Quicken.)
Last edited: