A workplace, even a private workplace, has a public element. If an employer in a private workplace says, however indirectly, "if you have sex with me, it will further your career" this is harassment and illegal.
If you cannot see how a similar "quid pro quo" could not be present regarding religion (especially since you adamantly assert your right to proselytize), then I maintain that you seem to have difficulty putting yourself into the potential quandary of the infidel sinner. It's very easy to move to "Fred over there doesn't seem to share our 'fellowship.' I'm not sure he's saved. I don't know if I trust him with more responsibility with the firm. I feel much more comfortable with Delbert, there. He's washed in the blood of the lamb like me." Therefore, the condemned infidel is forced to either pretend to be something he is not to protect his career, or to be seen as "not belonging." Either option is uncomfortable in and some sense can constitute a "hostile work environment." It is certainly not of the same gravity as sexual harassment, and not worth statutory protection, IMO, but it has some of the same elements.
The original poster clearly was discomfited by the situation, therefore I made a "wild" assumption what his employer was not the "Association of Baptist Ministers" or some such.
I have asserted that in many situations it is inappropriate and, yes, rude, to thrust your religion on other people. IMO, you seem incapable or, more likely, unwilling to discern these situations.
Every opportunity you get, you choose to call me "intolerant." I have not suggested that obnoxious proselytizers be beat up, censored, quashed, or shouted down. I have merely suggested that they lack manners.
Consequently, IMO, due to your insistence on calling me intolerant every chance you get, I find your behavior very troll-like. I have nothing more to say to you.
I won't even attempt to get into thinking about the relation of faith to thought.
