inflation

Ed--I agree with your opinion on marijuana only. It is essentially the worst parts of tobbaco and alcohol the rest of the drugs are too easily taken to excess and death as a result.

As far as taxes goes typically the rich own some sort of business if you tax them at a higher rate they will not take the pay cut and will raise their prices to cover the costs. I do think the tax code needs to be changed however I support a national sales tax on retail sales only. If you don't have a EIN you still pay the taxes on all purchases. This would dramatically increase the tax base while at the same time taxing the rich more than the poor. You could even go one step further and set a minimum amount on spending before you start taxing. So the minimum amount to live is not taxed. Similar to the customer curtesy cards at most stores, provide the card and no taxes until the minimum is met. If you forget your card enjoy your taxes.
 
Ed,

I feel your pain on a lot of your points, disagree with others. As a moderate GOPer, I have to take exception with your broad brush strokes that liberals are all hypocrits, I know plenty who stick by their guns (part of the reason they are getting left behind) and there is plenty of hypocrisy on both sides. It's funny how each side sees the other as blind slaves to the party, while they see themselves as free thinkers in a big tent, all the while, the party heads change their platform around with the political winds, and claim that was always their position. I'm a republican because I want smaller government and fiscal responsibility, and I haven't gotten either under the last three GOP Presidents! Frankly the extreme right scares the crap out of me and I think it's taking over the party. When I hear all those Ditto heads kiss the butt of Rush who on the one hand says "all drug users in jail!" then gets caught being a druggy himself, and please don't tell me there is a difference, the only difference is he could afford to buy off doctors instead of buying from the corner drug dealer.

As far as taxes. Right now we have a stealth regressive tax, where only the poor and middle class pay social security, and then that fund is raided to keep our "progressive" tax system at artificially low rates. Good step: raise the SS and medicare roof to a million, or whatever.
 
Isn't there something of a paradox here? If there's truly nothing special about your background or skills, and you received no special assistance along the way, then isn't this an admission that a lot of your success was simply a matter of "right place, right time." I fully admit that hard work, determination, personality, and good life choices play a role in success -- my own extended family climbed from absolute poverty to middle class by having these traits in abundance. But I also don't see how working harder (or even smarter) would catapault them into the multi-millionare category.

Not picking on you specifically TH, and have no idea if Ed's plan would be better than what we already got, just trying to come to grips with the mix of hard work and random chance in my own success. I don't think the matter of equity in taxation is an easy one.
Click to expand...

No picking detected. Chance and happenstance play at least a major if not dominant role in ones life. But you do make your own chances sometimes and take advantage of the opportunities given to you.

Some people make things happen and some let things happen to them. I made things happen.

I think the matter of taxation can be made very easy. Set a fixed rate on every person thats acceptable, and thats the budget the government gets to spend. Its only made complicated because the govt doesnt like that answer...
 
The harder I work, the luckier I get. (Samuel Goldwyn)
Click to expand...

Yes, I hear a lot of very, very successful people say this.

However, some of the hardest working, honest people that I know, that were dealt a very bad set of cards, never accumulated much wealth.

Hence, they were never given a Bully pulpit to broadcast their 'story'. So, you are only hearing from the very rich and successful. No one asks the guy that worked his As* off, was honest to the core and was screwed by a buisness associate, and is barely making ends meet. No one wants to hear his story.

The people that I know personally that are worth over $10 Million have repeated this often quoted phrase in my presence. But, I do know personally the people that they have screwed, used and run over. If this is what they are referring to as 'working hard' then I agree with them.

If you have ever seen a man digging in a ditch in the hot midwest summer sun, then you know that no matter how fast he digs or much he sweats, he will never be rich! ;)
 
...I support a national sales tax on retail sales only.  If you don't have a EIN you still pay the taxes on all purchases.  This would dramatically increase the tax base while at the same time taxing the rich more than the poor.  You could even go one step further and set a minimum amount on spending before you start taxing.  So the minimum amount to live is not taxed.
Click to expand...

So under your plan I can avoid paying all taxes if I get an EIN or just buy smaller units of things? What would be the minimum spending you would set?
 
When I say take the taxes up on the rich, I am talking about the ultra rich, the people that make money that is not deserved, a sports star that signs a 130 million contract, and someone that is in the street with no home, fair? I think not, how about a us private dodging bullets in afghan, for 1200 a month, to keep some ******* who can dribble a ball and throw it in a basket? fair? I think not, so why should the person making that kind of money pay for helping to keep someone in a home or in school? when someone is dodging bullets to keep the terrorists from putting burkas on our liberal women? the answer is they should pay and pay big. they are imo getting a free ride. I have not now or ever taken a nickel from the government, or any other person or org. I worked for what I have, I saved, when others were spending and having a good time. I watched others go on extended vacations, work when they only needed money, and screw the future. I never did, I always saved half of what ever was brought in for the week. I learned a trade and put it to use, and when the government takes a nickel out of my pocket it pisses me off. when some ******* can run around on a football field, or movie set, and make in 6months what several men will never see in a lifetime, fair? I think not.
that is why I think that people making a living wage should not have to pay taxes. because the country is like a car, the people like ceo's and sports stars movie stars, ect, are driving it 6 days a week, they get more use of it than the man who gets if for 10 min, a week. so they should have to pay for what they use.
If I was one of the ultra rich, I would not want to increase taxes. As far as the argument that people who make big money have businesses that keep people in jobs, true, and as long as they invest the profits into the business they should be able to deduct it, and not pay taxes on it. but when the helmselys of the world buy rare art, and Chippendale furniture for their apartments, and with it off, or a 175 foot yacht for "business"? fair, I think not. and as long as this goes on we have no national health care, another point I disagree with the right, when rush says that health care is not a right, I say bull ****, it is a basic human right, that is like saying that if you see someone on the sidewalk bleeding you have no responsibility to help. then what do we need a government for? to keep us safely in poverty? so congress can sip on 20$ martinis?
I don't believe in socialism but we do need to change things in this country. and the right and left are off. If a party could rise up that truly was for the people, they would wipe the right and lefts ass.
 
Yes, I hear a lot of very, very successful people say this.

However, some of the hardest working, honest people that I know, that were dealt a very bad set of cards, never  accumulated much wealth.  

Hence, they were never given a Bully pulpit to broadcast their 'story'. So, you are only hearing from the very rich and successful. No one asks the guy that worked his As* off, was honest to the core and was screwed by a buisness associate, and is barely making ends meet. No one wants to hear his story.

The people that I know personally that are worth over $10 Million have repeated this often quoted phrase in my presence. But, I do know personally the people that they have screwed, used and run over. If this is what they are referring to as 'working hard' then I agree with them.

If you have ever seen a man digging in a ditch in the hot midwest summer sun, then you know that no matter how fast he digs or much he sweats, he will never be rich! ;)
Click to expand...

Great post, Cut- Throat. Another example of history being written by the "winners". Did the American Indians lose their homeland becasue they didn't work hard?

Not the way I see it.

Mikey
 
Retire@40-- To start let me say I'm a small fish in a small pond, heck I'm even afraid of shrimp, and everything eats shrimp. The point is it's just an idea and I'm not an accountant or have any business type background so there are bound to be flaws in my thought.

If we went to a national retail sales tax then many of the current IRS employees would suddenly find themselves out of a job. Some of these people could be used to review the quarterly or yearly statements from a business. If they discover a plumber is buying say $100 in clothes every month using their EIN to avoid taxes then obviously there's probably scamming going on.

As far as the amount that can be spent without incurring sales tax the government already has a standard amount set for food, clothes, what not. If you ever file bankruptcy they'll tell you three people need about $650/month in food. These standards could be used to determine the exemption amount.
 
Sex, drugs, and... what was the other one?

When I hear all those Ditto heads kiss the butt of Rush who on the one hand says "all drug users in jail!" then gets caught being a druggy himself, and please don't tell me there is a difference, the only difference is he could afford to buy off doctors instead of buying from the corner drug dealer.
Click to expand...
"I used to have a drug problem, but now I make enough money to afford it." -- David Lee Roth.

Speaking as a veteran of the "war on drugs", I have to agree with legalizing marijuana. Even without taxes it'd save the military a ton of time & money. And it'd make it a lot easier to explain Cheech & Chong to my kid.

I'm not so sure about heroin, cocaine, MDMA, methamphetamines, and the rest. Making cocaine a test case would probably teach us all a lot.
 
Given the damage cigarettes and alcohol do to people and families, I doubt legalizing any of the other drugs with controls, taxation and legal limitations would really make that big of a difference.

Realistically you can get almost anything you want, almost anytime.

What you would eliminate is the organized crime and violence that surrounds the 'drug scene'.

Taking the tax dollars wasted having FBI agents rappelling into pot fields here in northern CA (thank heavens we've completely solves all of our other problem so we can focus on those pesky pot farmers), and collecting some nice tax revenues, we could offer some substantial services to help people lessen their addictions.

The big catch to it though is the legal limitations. Almost every illegal drug remains in your system for at least several days and up to several months in trace amounts. Almost every single state already has a zero tolerance law for driving under the influence of any drug. Hence, nobody that did drugs could ever drive legally without suffering loss of their license, paying thousands in fines, and being on probation for 2-4 years if they were caught. We already have laws on public intoxication. Workplaces already have rules about working under the influence.

Be nice to turn a net money loser and a war that cant be won into a money maker and address the root causes of the 'problem' rather than perpetuate the prohibitionist conundrum.
 
Drug money

Yeah, I think cocaine legalization would go a lot better this time than it did last century.

I hated counterdrug ops. At one point it seemed more cost-effective to surface the submarine, drive alongside, and just buy the entire shipment... especially when I was in white-knuckle shallow-water areas watching San Miguel beer barges drive by. As you can imagine, though, I never found a receptive wardroom where I felt that I could articulate these musings.

Then I met CAPT Neil Byrne. He's retired now, but he still makes John Birch, Attila the Hun, John Wayne, and the Klingon Empire look like a bunch of soft-hearted wussies. He enlisted during Vietnam and he survived earning the Legion of Merit as a young O-3 so I guess he's entitled to his opinions. As the PACOM "drug czar" in the late 1980s he used to coordinate military forces in the Pacific drug war. It took him about two weeks to decide that legalizing & taxing marijuana & cocaine would pay off the national debt in less than a decade. As long as the Navy kept doing urinalysis, he didn't think it'd change much...
 
I disagree with the Idea that the American natives lost there land because it was taken from them, they did not know how to use what they were living on.
Some will no doubt argue with me, but I tell you to go to the north woods and start making spears and live in teepees, give you your DVD players. and the like.
It is in my opinion just like south Africa, any one who knows any thing about this country, can not argue with this; the country was a gem, in the middle of a wild untamed continent, when they stupidly gave power to the "people of color" the country went to hell in a hand basket.
It is worse than east LA.
I don't make the truth, it just is.
How come 90% of crime is committed by blacks? I know you libes will blame the white man, you always do.
fat blacks are victims of the white burger and Twinkie factories, drunk blacks are the victims of the distillery companies. and blacks with drug problems are the victims of the CIA. lol
and the blacks in prison have been railroaded, you know FREE MUMIA, he did not shoot the cop, he was just defending him self from a white cop.
from what has happened in the last elections since 94 it looks like the people of the good old usa are sick of the bash the white man, and blame usa first. liberals going down down down. lol, we do need liberals to give the rest of us something to make fun of.
 
Its foolishness and tyranny of the guvmint telling adults what they can/can't put into their own bodies. And if you think Iraqi war is bad, then war on drugs may last forever.

Hey, here's an idea. Legalize and let the users fix social security. Get GWB on the phone! :D I mean, what a fix. The users pay huge taxes on their daily fix, die early, and don't get any or very little social security. Voila!
 
Yep

Nothing worse than a liberal with a dog, a 12 gauge, a pickup, and closet of Dickies coveralls - winter and summer weight.
 
Whoa ed, now we're bashing blacks? I'm judging from the lack of reaction on this board that we haven't offended anyone yet, but I think your heading down a road we don't want to go down! Your statements leave unanswered why more African Americans (as a percentage) are in unsavory states of being. If it's not circumstances, are you saying it's a genetic inferiority? I'm asking you to clarify your position, because I don't want any "ism" impressions left on this board.

Think about this: conservatives say the family is the number one influence on a child, and I agree (some say I'm conservative). But if your parents are illiterate former slaves, how much further along socio-economically will you get? Considering slavery transitioned into legal segragation that only ended around 1970, I think it's a little premature to imply blacks will always be downtrodden . You are going to have to cite your sources on those statistics there, too. Considering more than half the people in jail are white nationwide, are blacks just better at not getting caught? This rant of yours seems better suited to a "Church of the World Creator" board, eh?
 
Whoa ed, now we're bashing blacks?  I'm judging from the lack of reaction on this board that we haven't offended anyone yet
Click to expand...

I think the lack of reaction is because most people have decided not to feed the troll.

Ignore it and it will go away.
 
cal are you from the up ay, they call us trolls cauz we live under da bridge ay. yah.
Offend blacks, with the truth? Among men, blacks (28.5%) are about six times more likely than whites (4.4%)
to be admitted to prison during their life. Among women, 3.6% of blacks and
0.5% of whites will enter prison at least once. (U.S. Department of Justice)
Based on current rates of incarceration, an estimated 7.9% of black males
compared to 0.7% of white males will enter State of Federal prison by the
time they are age 20 and 21.4% of black males versus 1.4% of white males will
be incarcerated by age 30. (U.S. Department of Justice)
Some have noted that more black men are in prison in America than are in
college. (The Black and White of Justice, Freedom Magazine, Volume 128)
As jack would say YOU CANT HANDLE THE TRUTH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Here a few more stats, I gleaned from the FBI and us justice depts.

Blacks murder more than 1,600 whites each year.
Blacks murder whites at 18 times the rate whites murder blacks.
Blacks murdered, raped, robbed, or assaulted about one million whites in 1992.
In the last 30 years, blacks committed 170 million violent and non-violent crimes against whites.
Blacks under 18 are more than 12 times more likely to be arrested for murder than whites under 18.
About 90% of the victims of interracial crimes are white.
Blacks commit 7.5 times more violent interracial crimes than whites, although whites outnumber blacks by 7 to 1.
On a per capita basis, blacks commit 50 times more violent crime than whites.
Black neighborhoods are 35 times more violent than white neighborhoods.
Of the 27 million nonviolent robberies in 1992, 31% (8.4 million) were committed by blacks against whites. Less than 2% were committed by whites against blacks.
Of the 6.6 million violent crimes, 20% (1.3 million) were interracial.
Of the the 1.3 million interracial violent crimes, 90% (1.17 million) are black against white

So you can email the dept. of justice, and argue with them, maybe calling them trolls will show them the error of their stats. hahahahaha, you libs, we need a few of you to keep humor in politics
 
I guess you better get some more guns ed.

You never know when a "black" might jump out of the bushes.
 
Powerful statistics Ed, but the one I would point out is "3.6 percent of blacks enter prison at least once"

....so that means 96.4% aren't ex-cons! I was just saying you can't generalize. Poverty begets crime, and blacks are poorer than whites, on average. Why that is, I'm not even going to touch that conversation/debate! :D
 
Realized I misread your post, that was black women, your post says ~72% of black men never go to prison, but my point, I think, remains relevant.
 
Maybe sometime Ed will ponder WHY some of those statistics are the way they are, there is usually a cause to go with the effect.

By the way, 101.2% of those statistics are incorrect.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

ER Eddie
Question about Adjusting for Inflation with 4% Rule
2 3
Replies
51
Views
3K
hotwired
H
M
What is your Spreadsheet INFLATION assumption?
2 3
Replies
61
Views
3K
TickTock
T
M
Inflation simplified
2
Replies
25
Views
1K
mathjak107
M
2
Reducing stock exposure in Retirement, age 60+
4 5 6
Replies
144
Views
8K
Onda
O
C
$500,000 per couple primary residence exclusion and inflation
2 3 4
Replies
92
Views
5K
almost there
A

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom