If I run the calc for 50 years I get a higher percentage of success than if I ran it for 30 years. It's counterintuitive to me to think that my money would last for 50 years but not 30. But because FC works strictly on historical data there are more years of data to pull from in 30 year segments than 50 year segments.
So, I've been running my numbers based on 50 years. But I think I will start running my scenarios based on 30 to get more 'real' results. Or am I not seeing things correctly on FireCalc?
Are you planning to be financially independent as early as possible so you can live life on your own terms? Discuss successful investing strategies, asset allocation models, tax strategies and other related topics in our online forum community. Our members range from young folks just starting their journey to financial independence, military retirees and even multimillionaires. No matter where you fit in you'll find that Early-Retirement.org is a great community to join. Best of all it's totally FREE!
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest so you have limited access to our community. Please take the time to register and you will gain a lot of great new features including; the ability to participate in discussions, network with our members, see fewer ads, upload photographs, create a retirement blog, send private messages and so much, much more!
This community was started in 2002 as an alternative to a then fee only Motley Fool. The focus of the discussions is on topics related to early retirement and financial independence. The community is moderated to ensure a pleasant experience for our members.