Senator
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Having treatment recommendations influenced by what the insurance company will or will not cover, or what they will cover more generously, is not, IMO, the ideal way to treat or be treated.
Many of these offices will systematically steer a patient away from what is a "covered" procedure, to what is not, and then can charge what they want, trying to get away from the payment constraints of the contract.
So, be careful.
Do you think a Dentist would ever do a procedure in order to get additional revenue, even if it was not needed?
Insurance makes sure that the procedure is necessary, and not a procedure that the dentist wants to do before Christmas to get new shoes for his kids. Or maybe they are charging 20%+ more for a service than what is 'usual and customary'.
I would rather have insurance limiting cost, than a Dentist/Doctor. Until these professionals advertise their rates upfront, and compare to others so you can see, insurance is the way to go.
You can save money without insurance by limiting the services you take/purchase, but I do not think you save money by not having insurance and getting the same dental services that you would with insurance.