ziggy29
Moderator Emeritus
I think automation and outsourcing (global competition) already turned us into a service based economy with high unemployment and lower wages.
Oh, it has already started, but I think what we've seen is a drop in the bucket compared to what it can become. I just don't think we're going to return to an economy that needs close to 95% of its 22-to-64 population working who want to work, and soon (if not there already), probably not even 90%. Yes, supporting the automation will create a few jobs but probably not nearly as many as it displaces. We have two competing cultural, social (and yes, political) factors: One leading us inexorably toward increased structural unemployment and idleness through automation, and one often strongly opposed to expansion of a social safety net. We have to get past our usual zero-sum game thinking about policy if these two are to be reconciled, IMO.
And that says nothing about the problem of struggling with faltering financials of old-age programs combined with an economy that can't absorb a large number of (currently) retirement-aged individuals forced back to work by economic necessity (assuming they are still physically capable of work).
Increased unemployment, historically, has been cyclical. But the combination of offshoring and automation (in the long term, mostly the latter) are setting us up for increased *structural* unemployment, which requires a retooling of all our economic assumptions and, to some degree, policies.
That all said, from a FIRE point of view, if someone can keep a good job long enough to accumulate a lot of investments in those businesses who benefit from automation, you'll probably do OK unless more widespread unemployment leads to either deflation or massive social unrest. Then all bets could be off.