So it follows that DaVinci , Picasso, Michelangelo were all uncreative, sure the first piece of art was creative, but after that it was just cranking out repeat, repeat, repeat.
Sorry, but I've been doing creative stuff all my working life, and now in retirement, I'll still do it for pay. I also do it for my own private use.
Creating something new out of nothing but imagination and skill is to me being creative.
Maybe I didn't make my thoughts on the subject clear enough Sunset. If Picasso retired from his job, would you expect him to continue painting or would that be 'not retiring'?
When you retire, you have an OPPORTUNITY to do anything you want. Why not learn to fly or sail as Sengsational is doing? Why stay in your comfort zone and spend those 10 hours a week or whatever, doing what you have already spent years doing? You have a chance to do something NEW with your time, how you choose to use that time is of course completely up to you.
All I am suggesting is that there are alternatives and in my opinion, doing more of the same is a missed opportunity. You don't have to agree, I'm just saying give it a thought.