Nemo2
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
- Joined
- May 14, 2011
- Messages
- 8,368
Considering the news below, I wonder if the virus test is erratic, or the virus can lay undetected for almost as long as 2 weeks.
I was wondering about the same thing, reading a similar article.
1/29 - Japanese man who lives in Wuhan flies back to Japan on a charter flight. The test comes back negative. Quarantine in a hotel.
2/7 - Admitted to a hospital due to fever and coughs.
2/8 - He gets tested again on the morning of 2/8 and the test again comes back negative.
2/10 - He's tested again and this time, the test comes back positive.
Maybe the test can only detect the virus when the viral load is high enough?
CDC has developed a new laboratory test kit for use in testing patient specimens for 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). The test kit is called the “Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time Reverse Transcriptase (RT)-PCR Diagnostic Panel.” It is intended for use with the Applied Biosystems 7500 Fast DX Real-Time PCR Instrument with SDS 1.4 software. This test is intended for use with upper and lower respiratory specimens collected from persons who meet CDC criteria for 2019-nCoV testing. CDC’s test kit is intended for use by laboratories designated by CDC as qualified, and in the United States, certified under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) to perform high complexity tests. The test kits also will be shipped to qualified international laboratories, such as World Health Organization (WHO) Global Influenza Surveillance Response System (GISRS) laboratories. The test will not be available in U.S. hospitals or other primary care settings. The kits will be distributed through the International Reagent Resource (IRR).
An evacuee from China who had been evaluated for coronavirus was briefly released from a San Diego hospital before further testing alerted authorities that the person was infected, health officials say.
The person was among four cleared Sunday for discharge from UC San Diego Health after testing negative for the virus, the health system said in a statement. They went back to quarantine at a nearby air station. But on Monday morning, more testing that came back positive led one evacuee to return to the hospital for “observation and isolation,” the statement said.
At least 500 hospital staff in Wuhan had been infected with the deadly new strain of coronavirus by mid January, multiple medical sources have confirmed, leaving hospitals short-staffed and causing deep concern among health care workers.
While the government has reported individual cases of health care workers becoming infected, it has not provided the full picture, and the sources said doctors and nurses had been told not to make the total public
And another 600 suspected cases amongst medical personnel. Ugh. The Chinese regime's numbers are bull pucky.
The 6 pack of Tyvek suits I bought at the end of January are sold out on Amazon. Wow. I knew masks were in short supply, but suits?
I wonder what the TSA would do if you showed up at the airport in full corona virus battle dress - Tyvek suit, respirator, and goggles.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/02/12/asia/hong-kong-coronavirus-pipes-intl-hnk/index.html
Ugh. The sewage system is spreading this virus through a high rise apartment building.
Apparently the same problem occurred during the SARS epidemic.
This article shows ridiculous photos of cats and dogs wearing masks as their owners (in China) are afraid that their pets will also catch coronavirus, but that's not the point of my post. Look at the very first/top photo of the article. I imagine the photo was taken in China? Two women are doing something to a bunch of new masks ready to be shipped. I can't tell for sure if that's happening, as there are no explanations for this particular photo in the article, but at least, that's the way it looks to me.
How sanitary is that You would expect the masks to arrive germ-free, but now, I'm not so sure.
https://jp.sputniknews.com/asia/202002127099549/
I wish they had more info on chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG). 0.02% is an extremely low concentration when you consider that the scrub often prescribed for cleansing skin prior to surgery is 4%. The thing about CHG is that its antimicrobial activity persists for hours and it is safe for use on the skin with suitable precautions. I wondered why part of my preop home preparation for my rotator cuff surgery involved thorough washing of the site at home the day of the surgery. I figured what good would it do as it would just get recontaminated not knowing of CHG's persistence on the skin. Simple washing and/or use of alcohol based sanitizers don't do anything about the ease of recontamination.Need higher than 70% ethanol. BAC more effective at smaller concentration, getting it not too high or low will require careful measuring. Sodium hypochlorite at 1:50 dilution which is double the usual hospital concentration of 1:100. Pay attention to the time required to achieve results:
Persistence of coronaviruses on inanimate surfaces and its inactivation with biocidal agents
Günter Kampf, Daniel Todt, Stephanie Pfaender, Eike Steinmann
PII: S0195-6701(20)30046-3
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2020.01.022
Reference: YJHIN 5905
To appear in: Journal of Hospital Infection
Received Date: 31 January 2020
https://sci-hub.tw/10.1016/j.jhin.2020.01.022
online:
https://www.journalofhospitalinfection.com/article/S0195-6701(20)30046-3/fulltext