My parents both lived to 89. You know the saying the 60s are the go-go years; the 70s are the slow-go years; and the 80s are the no-go years? My parents hit 79 and it was like they fell off a cliff. I have no desire to make it to 89. I remember when I first read Ezekiel Emanuel's plan to refuse care/treatment after 75 and I thought it was awful. Now I think it makes an awful lot of sense and I hope I'm smart enough to take that approach, too.TBH I hope I don't make it past 90 and I'd settle for a lot less.
[emoji23]I don't think 100 is in the cards for me though. And if I slow to a crawl and need to be taken care of, I'll start drinking and smoking again!
I still like beer, but in moderation. And for smoking, I quit ~40 years ago and still miss it today. If I was reasonably sure I could keep it to a pack a week, I'd start up again.I don't think 100 is in the cards for me though. And if I slow to a crawl and need to be taken care of, I'll start drinking and smoking again!
I still like beer, but in moderation. And for smoking, I quit ~40 years ago and still miss it today. If I was reasonably sure I could keep it to a pack a week, I'd start up again.
The weird thing is when you are 88, given you make it that far, you'll probably have a different perspective.I have no desire to make it to 89.
The weird thing is when you are 88, given you make it that far, you'll probably have a different perspective.
The step from current health level to an imagined, much less attractive distant future health level lets you be pretty confident in saying 88 is enough. But as one rides the health decline, that becomes the new normal, and doesn't seem as bad. That's not to say there are no 88 year olds that would pop a cyanide tab if one appeared, but I think many more might say that even though the list of discomforts is long, they've managed to live with them so far, and want to hang in at least another season or two.
The weird thing is when you are 88, given you make it that far, you'll probably have a different perspective.
The step from current health level to an imagined, much less attractive distant future health level lets you be pretty confident in saying 88 is enough. But as one rides the health decline, that becomes the new normal, and doesn't seem as bad. That's not to say there are no 88 year olds that would pop a cyanide tab if one appeared, but I think many more might say that even though the list of discomforts is long, they've managed to live with them so far, and want to hang in at least another season or two.
In any case the real issue is healthspan not lifespan.
Nice piece in the WSJ here.
Paywalled, I'm sure, but the main takeaways:
If you can make it past 90, genetics goes up from 25% of the solution to more like 50%.
There are about 109,000 people in the US now over 100 years of age, up from 65,000 ten years ago. Despite the decline in overall life expectancy, roughly 20% of us have the genes to make it to 100 if we do everything else right.
Early on never thought I 'd make it past 30, now on doorstep of 76, 80 seems probable. Not betting on anything.