pb4uski
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
I just happened to be looking at this exact issue, since I've been making triple principle payments every month in order to pay down a newly refinanced 15-year mortgage to pay it off in about 5-years (Which is when I want to retire). I have a $300K, 15-year at 3%.
So, I started to question if it would be better to invest the money that is now going to extra principle payments. I set up an Excel program to calculate the growth of said investment for various average yearly RORs (3%-12%). I also added in the difference in taxes due to the mortgage interest payments. I made the assumption that at retirement (5-years) I would either have paid my mortgage off through accelerating the payments, or I would use the funds gained from investing to payoff the mortgage so that I didn't have to worry about it after retirement.
Results at 5 years:
If the investment ROR averages 5% over five years, I'd have an additional $18K from making investments vice paying down the mortgage. At an average 8% ROR over five years, that number would be $38K. At 10% it would be $53K. That said, if the average ROR is only 3% then the number is about $6K.
The difference in taxes by investing vice paying down was about $5.4K over 5 years (advantage to keeping mortgage and investing the "extra")
Frankly, I still don't know which way I want to go.
Dan
Why wasn't it a push at 3% since that is your mortgage rate if you earn 3% that is taxable and pay 3% that is tax deductible? Might have to do with compounding of the investment earnings given your 5 year time horizon?