I track personal residence separately from other real assets in my spreadsheet.
For those who include real estate in their net worth, how do you value it?
I update mine once a year at assessed value, which seems conservative.
We live in Hawaii & since both our home & our rental properties are paid off, by definition, we're real estate heavy:
Home $1,426,000 34.2%
Rentals $1,309,000 31.4%
Cash, savings, etc. $1,434,000 34.4%
We don't plan to move, so our home value isn't considered for retirement income. Our rentals bring in $4,210 monthly, but are getting more difficult for us to manage, so we'll probably sell them in the next 5 years. But, since they bring in 53.1% of our retirement income, we'll look hard at where to put those sale funds.
Flyfish1 said:About 25%-30% of net worth in RE, REIT's and private equity CRE funds. This does not count my primary or secondary residences. Love real estate, been an investor for many years, prefer multi family properties. But like all investing it is good to diversify by asset class and in the case of real estate also geographically. I used to own physical properties and put together deals, now I prefer the funds and REIT's, much easier.
Selling off rentals is so much harder than we think. The tax hit is tremendous, especially if they’re highly appreciated and owned for a long time. I am truly shell shocked by how much taxes I have to pay. I am selling/have sold 11 appreciated properties and with recapture depreciation tax, 20% capital gains, 3.8% net investment tax and state tax, I am seriously contemplating whether I want to even get rid of any more houses. This market doesn’t present good opportunities for 1031 exchange with only 45 days to identify a replacement property. My other option would be a DST but then your money is tied up with low returns and you lose total control. It’s a real dilemma.
Those of you who don't count RE as part of your net worth will be quite in shock that the lawyer who sues you will definitely count it!
That is absolutely true. I’ve sold three properties every year for the last three years. Making an average profit of $100,000 per property has resulted in one property paying for the taxes on the sales. That’s a big bite out of your profit on something you’ve owned and managed for dozens of years. Yes, I know it’s unavoidable but in selling you’ve loss the ability to earn from the $100,000 you’ve now lost, or in my case $300,000.
I’ve had to limit the number of my sales to no more than three a year just to be able to stomach it. Especially since there really is nowhere safer to put the funds and earn anywhere near the same rate of return on them.
The only reason to sell is if you really don’t want to be a landlord forever.