MasterBlaster
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2005
- Messages
- 4,391
I have a fair amount of knowledge so am happy to share. This would be relevant in California and perhaps some other states. General free advice so take it for what it cost you.
If you have any real property (even a timeshare) you should probably consider a living trust. In California all interests in real property require trips to the probate court after death. If the value is less than $150k there are abbreviated probate court options but it's still probate court and it's still much more expensive than a trust.
Also, payable on death accounts are ok but that is only death planning. What about if you become incapacitated? You want it to be easy for your trusted person to pay your bills. A trust is superior. The problem is a lot of financial institutions do not honor, or only honor after a fight, powers of attorney. They honor trusts but not powers of attorney; I am not sure why. Unless you use their specific POA form from the financial institution.
Also, in addition to the trust, you should have a will, a POA, a health care directive (or called living will or maybe called health care POA), a HIPPA release, a certified extract of trust and a general transfer statement which indicates your intent for your assets to be in your trust. This last document is important in California as it can help transfer assets to a trust after death without a full probate.
IRAs and retirement accounts are a totally separate issue due to tax implications. Can be better to name individuals directly rather than a trust. However, if minor children then name the trust.
Above all else... MAKE SURE YOUR ASSETS (other than retirement accounts) ARE ACTUALLY TITLED IN YOUR TRUST!
Trusts are all good and fine and thank you for your post and the information.
However, I'll take an alternative position for arguments sake.
There are no trust police and pretty much nobody is watching. Some morally challenged executors may just help themselves at the expense of the rightful successor trustees. I have personally seen, as a bystander such behavior.
In Probate (As you know) the court supervises the disbursement of assets. There is much less chance for "funny business" than with a trust.
Probate costs are not insignificant, but as a percentage of the estate, these fees are modest. So for example, In California a $2MM estate would have (normal) probate fees of $33k. that's just 1.65% of the estate value. While I agree that $33k is not chicken feed, relative to the estate it isn't all that much.
So absent special circumstances, I believe that for many estates that normal Probate (with a professionally drawn will) is the way to go.
If title to the property is held in Joint-Tenancy then the property will pass to the other joint tenant(s) outside of probate.In California all interests in real property require trips to the probate court after death
Last edited: