pb4uski
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Fixed it. Thanks for the heads up.
pb4uski has a typo. 12% + 15% = 27% not 37%
pb4uski has a typo. 12% + 15% = 27% not 37%
Thank you. My accounts are with Schwab so I just opened up a Roth IRA with them, yeah extremely easy. I have no pension so my only income at 70 would be RMD's ( think now they moved age to 72) as well as SS, and dividends from the taxable account.
Can you elaborate on what you mean by:
"Keep an eye on 0% capital gains rate if you qualify. One of many possible reasons to limit Roth conversions. However at your age large Roth conversions are probably worth more than 0% capital gains."
For single filers in 2020 ( https://www.nerdwallet.com/blog/taxes/capital-gains-tax-rates/ ):
Long-term capital gains tax rate Your taxable income
0% $0 to $40,000
15% $40,001 to $441,450
20% $441,451 or more
* Short-term capital gains are taxed as ordinary income according to federal income tax brackets.
Roughly, if your taxable income (regular + capital gains) stays within the 12% bracket your capital gains tax is 0%. If capital gains put you over the 12% bracket the amount over the bracket is taxed at 15%. The 12% bracket and 0% capital gains bracket have been decoupled now, so they are a little different. Try your situation with an online tax calculator to see how it works for you.
For me it looked best to Roth convert until about 10 years away from my first Roth withdrawal, allowing plenty of time for the tax free growth to accumulate. Within the 10 years before my first Roth withdrawal (next year) I'll fill just the 10% bracket with a small Roth conversion and dividends and make sure I have enough capital gains to fill the 0% capital gains bracket.
So I spoke to my accountant finally on this. Based on my expected tax situation for 2020 I would be looking at a total tax payment of 10K if I transferred 40K from my traditional IRA to a Roth IRA. I'm really conflicted what to do here.
Sure, it would be nice at age 70 to have an account that is all tax free , but to shell out 10K in taxes every year for like 15 years( assuming I transfer 40K a year and tax situation is similar) is a sizeable amount.
Well. you can bite the bullet and pay the taxes later when you must take RMd's, and maybe at a higher tax rate.
So I spoke to my accountant finally on this. Based on my expected tax situation for 2020 I would be looking at a total tax payment of 10K if I transferred 40K from my traditional IRA to a Roth IRA. I'm really conflicted what to do here.
Sure, it would be nice at age 70 to have an account that is all tax free , but to shell out 10K in taxes every year for like 15 years( assuming I transfer 40K a year and tax situation is similar) is a sizeable amount.
yes, and heres why---here is note from my accountant.So to be clear... absent a Roth conversion your tax would be ~$0.... and if you add a $40k Roth conversion your tax will be $10k? If so then the effective rate on the conversion is 25%?
Is that just Federal or both Federal and state (and city if applicable)?
So combined 17% effective rate on that first $30k, 37% on the next $10k and 37% on the next $10k.
So it looks like the first $30k isn't so bad.... 7% Federal and 10% state. But then 27% Federal and 10% state after that.
I'm guessing that the 27% Federal is 12% ordinary and 15% on qualified income pushed from 0% to 15%.
Each $10000 increase results in another $2700 in FED taxes from 30K to 40K and from 40K to 50K. So, it looks like those amounts are fully in the "27%" tax bracket (12% + 15%). The first $2217 is less than 27%, so not all of the conversion is at the "27%" tax bracket. How much FED tax would you pay on a $20K Roth conversion?
IMO 17% combined federal and state on the first $30k of conversion is pretty good, at 17% likely a lot less than you (or your heirs) will pay later if you don't convert.
+1IMO 17% combined federal and state on the first $30k of conversion is pretty good, at 17% likely a lot less than you (or your heirs) will pay later if you don't convert.
IMO 17% combined federal and state on the first $30k of conversion is pretty good, at 17% likely a lot less than you (or your heirs) will pay later if you don't convert.
yes, and heres why---here is note from my accountant.
you would have 0 tax liability for the irs and $959 due to nys/nyc.
if you take $30,000 out of an ira to convert, you will owe the irs $2,217 and $3,911 to nys/nyc.
(2217+3911-959)/30000 = 17.23%
It is the effective tax rate on the $30K of Roth conversions. You are correct that your total effective tax rate is closer to 12%.
(2217+3911-959)/30000 = 17.23%
So are you suggesting I do only a 30K transfer into a Roth?
So I would pay ~6K in taxes.
....So at age 70 if tax rates stay the same I will be at 22% tax bracket....
Yes, while you'll be paying $6,128, it is only $5,169 as a result of the $30,000 Roth conversion... or 17% on the $30k. If you don't convert and wait as late as possible then you'll pay a lot more in tax won't you ... because you'll have 85% of SS additionally in income.
Your effective federal rate on a $30k conversion would be 7% [(2,217-0)/30,000=7%]... to me it is better to pay 7% now than 22% later. And then you have that pesky state tax. Now if you plan to move to a no-tax state sometime soon then the advice might be different.
Earnings @ 5% | Roth conversions | Balance | |
0 | 500,000 | ||
1 | 24,250 | -30,000 | 494,250 |
2 | 23,940 | -30,900 | 487,290 |
3 | 23,569 | -31,827 | 479,032 |
4 | 23,132 | -32,782 | 469,382 |
5 | 22,625 | -33,765 | 458,242 |
6 | 22,043 | -34,778 | 445,506 |
7 | 21,380 | -35,822 | 431,064 |
8 | 20,631 | -36,896 | 414,799 |
9 | 19,790 | -38,003 | 396,586 |
10 | 18,851 | -39,143 | 376,293 |
11 | 17,807 | -40,317 | 353,782 |
12 | 16,651 | -41,527 | 328,906 |
13 | 15,376 | -42,773 | 301,510 |
14 | 13,974 | -44,056 | 271,428 |
15 | 12,437 | -45,378 | 238,487 |
16 | 10,756 | -46,739 | 202,504 |