I believe amended 1099 Forms are caused by the individual companies which are reporting the information to the broker. That sometimes a company or fund takes a long time to finalize their financials and provide incomplete information the first time around (Feb 15th). For example I have seen that with companies that later shifted some of their qualified dividend payment into a Return-of-Capital category or vice-versa. I might imagine there is some knock-on-effect going on within a complex fund that is waiting for certain reporting information to be received by the end of January (or Feb 15?) and this causes them to issue updates weeks after that.We have E-Trade and I would not recommend them to anyone. Their fees are competitive but reports of consolidated 1099 Forms are horrible and they amend them usually for 2 - 3 times per Tax season.
We have E-Trade and I would not recommend them to anyone. Their fees are competitive but reports of consolidated 1099 Forms are horrible and they amend them usually for 2 - 3 times per Tax season.
Just did a quick review and my E-Trade brokerage had one amended consolidated 1099 in the past 7 years. That was for the 2018 tax year.amend them usually for 2 - 3 times per Tax season
That's bad I did not know that. Anybody else notice this?
We use Vanguard (Roths, SEP, IRA) and Schwab (401(k) rollovers).Which brokerage account do you use? Did you switch before or after retirement? I stupidly moved my money out of TD ameritrade in September because i thought I was refinancing with BofA to ML. I ended up not doing that and now I am considering moving back I don't like ML website or dashboard. But since I'm now not stuck at TD, I figure I might as well research moving to somewhere else. Possibly Fidelity or Vanguard.
What do you have? Did you switch? And what are the pros and cons?
I just got an email from Vanguard, they will begin charging $25 usd for transactions requiring a phone representative. I'm already extremely unimpressed with the functionality of their website. It seems I may be taking my seven- figure investing business back to Fidelity. They have an office 2-3 miles from my house, and they don't charge when you walk in.
I just got an email from Vanguard, they will begin charging $25 usd for transactions requiring a phone representative. I'm already extremely unimpressed with the functionality of their website. It seems I may be taking my seven- figure investing business back to Fidelity. They have an office 2-3 miles from my house, and they don't charge when you walk in.
+1I got that and was slightly alarmed at first. That is specific to Transaction Fee mutual funds. No impact to me and probably most of us.
If you are paying TDA a % of assets, then you are paying way too much for what you get from them.
If you are paying TDA a % of assets, then you are paying way too much for what you get from them.
I don't believe Romer is stating this.
I have a seven-figure Ameritrade account and get occasional calls from my rep (whose name I don't even know) asking me if everything is good, can they help with something etc. No fee involved. I'm sure they are looking for opportunities to do a managed account etc., but are polite and non-hassling.
TDA is a good, low cost broker that has been bought out by (merged with) Schwab. Schwab is also a good low cost broker. They may not have merged/moved accounts over from the TDA platform but it's probably coming. You should have heard something on this.I know this is an older thread, but thought it best to add it here and ask my question
my IRAs are at TD Ameritrade and have been with them through one iteration or another for 20 years and never had an issue. I do have someone check in on me as named rep but have told him I am fine as I manage my own investments. Is there something I am missing in not using this rep? I have asked him a couple of questions and gotten quick answers and he did point out that you can only do one rollover out and back into your IRA in a year. I took a lot of out $$ To help my daughter between houses and paid it back in 38 days
The other question I have since I own stocks and funds, what risk is there having only 1 broker vs those of you who have several accounts. My reading of the legal documents is even if they go under, I still own my stocks, Bonds and funds.
I didn't see a reason to diversify brokers or is it because of the different products they sell? Do you get a better deal on Vanguard funds if your money is there?
As a side note, my 401K is with Empower
Yes, same thing for us at Schwab, where Romer will eventually end up. The only difference is I work to make sure my rep knows my name, undertands what we are doing, etc. I show interest in his life and kids. I believe I get better service for questions and assistance with administrivia when I am not some faceless voice on the phone....
I have a seven-figure Ameritrade account and get occasional calls from my rep (whose name I don't even know) asking me if everything is good, can they help with something etc. No fee involved. I'm sure they are looking for opportunities to do a managed account etc., but are polite and non-hassling.
You're getting good info here; I'll just comment on the 401K. There's no reason to move it unless (1) you are getting charged fees over and above the expense charges in your mutual fund choices. These can be cleverly hidden; verify with your HR department that you are not paying "account service fees" or something like that. ("Zero" is the only acceptable answer.)... As a side note, my 401K is with Empower
...
I didn't see a reason to diversify brokers or is it because of the different products they sell? Do you get a better deal on Vanguard funds if your money is there?
....