MooreBonds
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
In the US this job would fall to attorneys.... it is common for a company to be sued when a stock goes down due to some announcement from a company, even if it is a warranted announcement....
True, the ambulance chasers would be on the scene within minutes of the announcement hitting the wires....but then it is up to the company reaching a settlement for a portion of a potential loss - IF the company doesn't want to roll the dice and take a chance in a full-blown court proceeding. Given that the company was forthcoming in their public statements, they could argue that they were merely being open and upfront with their plans, and they could get out scott free if a judge rules in their favor.
A gov't regulator, however, could throw all of that out the window and still stick it to them. If I had a choice between an honest gov't regulator (HA! I know, but just keep playing this "what if" game) going to bat for me and an ambulance chasing class action lawyer, I would likely side w/ the gov't regulator, because I don't believe they are as beholden to legal precedent as a judge may be.