davebarnes
Thinks s/he gets paid by the post
Which is stoopid.But under the current NC rules for vote by mail you have to have either 2 witnesses or a notary
We have none of that nonsense in Colorado. And, our measured fraud approaches zero.
Which is stoopid.But under the current NC rules for vote by mail you have to have either 2 witnesses or a notary
Which is stoopid.
We have none of that nonsense in Colorado. And, our measured fraud approaches zero.
100% vote-by-mail is far from the answer. states that have embraced this method have had decades to work out the kinks and pitfalls. as a former illinous judge of election i have serious doubts that most states could make the transition in less than 6-mos.
https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/04/07/danger-moving-vote-by-mail-168602
https://www.heritage.org/election-integrity/commentary/vote-mail-makes-fraud-and-errors-worse
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/491862-pandemic-sparks-partisan-brawl-over-voting-by-mail
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...safer-our-health-it-comes-with-risks-its-own/
Thanks. I read the articles, well, 1, 3 and 4 anyway since 2 is partisan and the mods admonished us not to go there. My take from the articles is, as you say, there are kinks to work out and decades of experience to copy directly from the successful states. Ultimately, what’s most needed is will and the states and countries that actually want all their qualified citizens to have the opportunity to vote figure out how to implement vote by mail, even the states where a voter can legally enjoy a hand roll while voting, so it can’t be that difficult.
Sounds great in theory. But with all the hacking of allegedly secure web sites that are too numerous to mention, and the allegations of foreign interference in the 2016 election, it would take a lot to make me confident in the security of such a system.