Lsbcal
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
I came across an interesting comment on a security blog (https://www.ici.org/viewpoints/view_17_cyber_06 ):
I recall that Rick Steves mentioned off hand that he never uses hotel room safes. But he did not expand on the why. I think it is partly because it is too easy to check out and forget your stuff. So he just recommends a money belt or similar security measure.
We have used hotel safes with no issues but I'm thinking of not doing so in the future.
And here is an article with a video showing a hotel employee in Spain stealing: https://www.corporatetravelsafety.com/safety-tips/how-safe-are-hotel-room-safes/If you are starting to notice how physical security and information security are linked, it is because they complement each other. This brings me to the ubiquitous hotel room safe—a misnomer if ever there was one! Most hotel room safes use an electronic number pad that require you to enter a “secret” four-digit code to lock and open the safe. Common sense would tell you that there must be more than one way to gain access to the contents of these safes—for example, if there is a malfunction with the safe’s electronics. Next time you check in to a hotel room that has a safe, look to see if it has a metal nameplate on the front, with the safe’s logo. These are usually screwed on and can be removed to reveal a keyhole that can be easily manipulated to unlock the safe. Importantly, the safe can be relocked the same way and the nameplate replaced without you ever suspecting an unauthorized entry.
I recall that Rick Steves mentioned off hand that he never uses hotel room safes. But he did not expand on the why. I think it is partly because it is too easy to check out and forget your stuff. So he just recommends a money belt or similar security measure.
We have used hotel safes with no issues but I'm thinking of not doing so in the future.