I hope you have better luck with Fitzy TV that I have. This is what I get:
Recently, we were going to cord cut, because our combined uncapped high speed Internet normally $89 here, and cable tv with sports channels was up to $255, with tax $285. I called to cut down to just the Internet. After talking to the retention department and saying no repeatedly to offers, they gave us a price of $121, and with tax, $146 for life. They said aside from variation in taxes, it stays that way unless we make changes. It seems hard to believe, but our bills have been coming in at that amount so far. We will see.
We have Suddenlink through Altice. We will probably stay for the time being.
Legal? Safe? If it sounds too good to be true...Click on your favorite channel here and tell me what you think.
https://ustvgo.tv/
...the Tuvalu government sought to capitalize on the .tv suffix being similar to "television". In 2010, nearly 10% of the revenue of the Government of Tuvalu came from royalties from .tv addresses.
Legal? Safe? If it sounds too good to be true...
I'm thinking my cable, internet, landline and mobile cell service for ~$185 is sounding better all the time. We tried cutting the cable on one tv to see what we thought of using an antenna and a Firestick, and the frustration was too much for these old people. The older I get, the more I'm willing to pay for convenience and easy-peazy.
.... As for my cutting the cord however, I'm still using an OTA antenna and putting up with my troubled CBS reception .
Maybe I'm misinterpreting your question, apologies if I am. I'm not OK with doing something I (should) know is illegal, I don't subscribe to the it's not stealing if you don't get caught school of thought. I wouldn’t be OK with someone stealing my legit services, so it’s not OK to do so to others. We can all well afford to pay for services we receive, and shouldn't expect them for free IMO. All the networks have significant expenses.Good questions. I am impressed but have access to everything on their list anyway so it is not that useful... to me.
Just out curiosity, however, what is the (user's personal) penalty for accessing (watching) "illegal" broadcasts?
Have you tried an signal booster or amplifier?
Maybe I'm misinterpreting your question, apologies if I am. I'm not OK with doing something I (should) know is illegal, I don't subscribe to the it's not stealing if you don't get caught school of thought. We can all well afford to pay for services we receive, and shouldn't expect them for free IMO.
Maybe I'm misinterpreting your question, apologies if I am. I'm not OK with doing something I (should) know is illegal, I don't subscribe to the it's not stealing if you don't get caught school of thought. I wouldn’t be OK with someone stealing my legit services, so it’s not OK to do so to others. We can all well afford to pay for services we receive, and shouldn't expect them for free IMO. All the networks have significant expenses.
Time2;2452434 I hope we get to the point where the networks just put their stream on the internet and raise the price they charge for commercials. Ending the cable middleman. Or get to pick and chose our station choices and not have to pay for 42 channels we don't watch.[/QUOTE said:
My antenna is indoor only.
You can still do a signal boost to an indoor antenna.
Don't hold your breath, that shipped sailed a while ago. AT&T, Comcast, Fox, Disney, ViacomCBS, and Discovery already control most of the popular networks. The big 6 more will make sure you pay more for a la carte than for their full lineup, they're way ahead of us. Advertisers AND consumers will both continue to pay as much as they can get from us...like EVERY for profit business.I hope we get to the point where the networks just put their stream on the internet and raise the price they charge for commercials. Ending the cable middleman.
Or get to pick and chose our station choices and not have to pay for 42 channels we don't watch.