I found an interesting site from NPR. Not sure it hasn't been posted already, but this one purports to be updated to today's date.
https://www.npr.org/sections/health...king-the-spread-of-the-coronavirus-in-the-u-s
The data are massaged and shown in a number of ways which may or may not be instructive to us. The visuals are rather stunning - especially the US map showing mostly "red" (bad) for all but a few states or territories. Heh, heh, Hawaii happens to be yellow, not red, but I digress.
After spending some time with the changeable presentations, it would seem to me (a totally IMHO and YMMV view) that "deaths per 100,000" might be the most instructive calculated comparison - area vs other area. It is not affect by varying "testing rates", area to area. Again, IMHO and YMMV, deaths are the most definitive raw statistic for (maybe) obvious reasons. So, calculated per 100,000 residents it would keep the same relative "validity." Feel free to ignore my "analysis" as, well, you know, YMMV.