Moving everything into VOO / VTI

Safire

Recycles dryer sheets
Joined
Mar 20, 2021
Messages
227
Let's say we invest a sum of 500K into VOO / VTI, and continue DCA-ing each month into this a total of 20K / year. Over a 15 year time frame, would this is be enough to help a couple retire and live on just the dividends generated (assume they have a paid off house, do not travel or take expensive vacations and live on about $5000 / month)?

Is this doable or is this a fool's dream? Would VOO or VTI be a better pick for this "strategy"?

I just want to make sure I got the math and facts right on this.

Thank you!
 
You’d need to understand whether or not you’re including other sources of income like Social Security and any pension. Since you have 15 years, you have plenty of time to do the modeling required to answer your question. Remember, while the fund may increase at say 5% on average, inflation will also come into play over the next 15 years.
 
If you look at the Top 10 Holdings they are both loaded with FANGG stocks and not sure thats a good thing. I would put some into VYM and SCHD.
 
Let's say we invest a sum of 500K into VOO / VTI, and continue DCA-ing each month into this a total of 20K / year. Over a 15 year time frame, would this is be enough to help a couple retire and live on just the dividends generated (assume they have a paid off house, do not travel or take expensive vacations and live on about $5000 / month)?

Is this doable or is this a fool's dream? Would VOO or VTI be a better pick for this "strategy"?

I just want to make sure I got the math and facts right on this.

Thank you!


Too many questions and variables here for a concise answer Safire. So just a few comments.

Of course investing $500k lump + $20k/yr for 15 years would "help a couple retire."

Whether it would be enough to live off the dividends (about 1.5%) is another question. You don't know how much all that VTI will be worth in 15 years. And living off only the dividends from VTI would be quite a low WR. To have the divs = the $60k/yr spending you want, you'd need $4 million. Pretty aggressive plan.

My FIRE portfolio is dominated by total stock market and similar low cost funds accumulated over decades. I didn't have a lump sum to begin with as you do, but I had more time. Took me about 30 years.

Good luck!
 
Last edited:
OP's plan is a start, but the $20k per year of additional money going into investments seems low for a couple.
401(k) plus Roth IRA contribution limits are now up to $30k per year or more if over 50.

Put aside $60k per year and increasing each year and you'll be in better shape...
 
Impossible to tell the future, but one thing for sure is I would not be comfortable with this strategy because its lacking diversification. US equities could be in a slump for the next 5-10 years for all we know especially if the Fed abandons its easy money policy for a while. I would add some bonds, international, emerging market, and gold/silver and adjust accordingly based on economic conditions and policies.
 
Let's say we invest a sum of 500K into VOO / VTI, and continue DCA-ing each month into this a total of 20K / year. Over a 15 year time frame, would this is be enough to help a couple retire and live on just the dividends generated (assume they have a paid off house, do not travel or take expensive vacations and live on about $5000 / month)?

Is this doable or is this a fool's dream? Would VOO or VTI be a better pick for this "strategy"?

I just want to make sure I got the math and facts right on this.

Thank you!
I would not lump sum such an amount unless it was already invested in mostly large cap US equities.

What makes you think today is the moment the market reached bottom, vs. tomorrow or next week or next month. Me, I can't fully see the future, so I would likely leg in keeping the rest in a T-Bill ladder to be allocated over the next 12 months.

I would also not just go VOO which is very tech heavy with 20.28% in Apple, Amazon, Google, Tesla, Amazon, Meta. Unless forced (e.g. limited choices in a 401k), why buy these in an ETF when you can just buy the individual holdings...which then gives you more control on taking losses or gains. Instead, for *some* of the money (note, not all -you can still do some VOO), consider equal weight ETF's like RSP (SP-500 equal weight) which would be much harder to replicate with individual equity purchases.

However, it's your money to invest how you decide. Good luck with your decision.
 
Last edited:
Let's say we invest a sum of 500K into VOO / VTI, and continue DCA-ing each month into this a total of 20K / year. Over a 15 year time frame, would this is be enough to help a couple retire and live on just the dividends generated (assume they have a paid off house, do not travel or take expensive vacations and live on about $5000 / month)?

Is this doable or is this a fool's dream? Would VOO or VTI be a better pick for this "strategy"?

I just want to make sure I got the math and facts right on this.

Thank you!

FIRECalc suggests it is not a fool's dream. $60k spending, $500k portfolio, 45 year time horizon, 100% equities, retire in 2037 and add $20k a year from 2022 to 2037, all other default assumptions and that doesn't include any SS which most people are eligible to collect.

Your spending in every year after the first year will be adjusted for inflation, so the spending power is preserved.

Because you indicated a future retirement date (2037), the withdrawals won't start until that year. Your contributions will continue until then. The tested period is 15 years of preretirement plus 30 years of retirement, or 45 years.

FIRECalc looked at the 107 possible 45 year periods in the available data, starting with a portfolio of $500,000 and spending your specified amounts each year thereafter.

Here is how your portfolio would have fared in each of the 107 cycles. The lowest and highest portfolio balance at the end of your retirement was $-316,164 to $26,859,957, with an average at the end of $5,430,313. (Note: this is looking at all the possible periods; values are in terms of the dollars as of the beginning of the retirement period for each cycle.)

For our purposes, failure means the portfolio was depleted before the end of the 45 years. FIRECalc found that 4 cycles failed, for a success rate of 96.3%.

One reservation is that this is based on past history and the next 15 years may well be lower returns than historical averages... think of Japan... some experts suspect that may be the case so just monitor the situation.

Another concern is that there might be additional equity losses before the bottom of the trough is here and if that happens the declne in value may adversely impact the results, so I would be careful.

Input Data for this model

Withdrawals 60,000
Plan End 45
95% Rule from WorkLess, Live More*
Percentage used for 95% Rule* 0
Bernicke Spending Reductions*
Current Age (for scheduling Bernicke spending reductions)* 48
Starting Portfolio 500,000
Percent in Stocks 100%
Expense Ratio 0.18%
Retirement Year* 2037
Contributions until then* 20,000
Social Security* 0
Starting in* 2035
Spouse Social Security* 0
Starting in* 2037
Other withdrawal change* +0
Starting in* 2025
Inflation adjusted* yes
Other withdrawal change* +0
Starting in* 2027
Inflation adjusted* yes
Other withdrawal change* +0
Starting in* 2031
Inflation adjusted* yes
Lump sum change to portfolio* +0
In year 2025
Lump sum change to portfolio* +0
In year * 2035
Lump sum change to portfolio* +0
In year * 2040
Inflation Rate selected* CPI
Fixed income model * LongInterest
Override start year* 1871
Terminal Value* 0
US Micro Cap** 10
US Small** 10
US Small Value** 10
S&P 500** 40
US Large Value** 40
US LT Treasury** 10
LT Corporate Bond** 15
1 Month Treasury** 5
 
Last edited:
My "new" money is going into Vtsax (same as VTI) & Wellesley fund. I've been conservative for a long time and willing to take a little more risk. Wellesley is a bit more balanced and pays a touch more on dividends and less on the FAANG exposure. Plus a little bonds...
 
Let's say we invest a sum of 500K into VOO / VTI, and continue DCA-ing each month into this a total of 20K / year. Over a 15 year time frame, would this is be enough to help a couple retire and live on just the dividends generated (assume they have a paid off house, do not travel or take expensive vacations and live on about $5000 / month)?

Is this doable or is this a fool's dream? Would VOO or VTI be a better pick for this "strategy"?

I just want to make sure I got the math and facts right on this.

Thank you!

I would not put new money into the stock market right now. The SP500 is down -19.7% since the high. In a recession the markets have been down (on average) something like -35%.
 
You’d do better with SCHD and VYM. I have to disagree with the folks here about waiting, because market timing rarely works and time in the market works better.
SCHD and VYM both concentrate on companies that grow their dividends each year over a long period of time, even during some troubled economic times. Do some research and check them out.
 
VYM trails VTI since it’s inception in Jan 2007, 8.32% vs 8.97%.

SCHD beats VTI since it’s inception in Jan 2012, 13.98% vs 13.19%. VYM does the worst at 12.14%. VOO is at 13.55%.

They’re all in the same ballpark.
 
Here are some comparison charts from etf.com.

IMG_4445.jpg
IMG_4446.jpg
IMG_4447.jpgIMG_4448.jpg
 
About 75% of my portfolio is VOO and VTI…. It’s a solid choice IMHO with a ~10% annualized avg return. I actually use them as tax loss harvesting partners because their returns are very similar.
 
You’d need to understand whether or not you’re including other sources of income like Social Security and any pension. Since you have 15 years, you have plenty of time to do the modeling required to answer your question. Remember, while the fund may increase at say 5% on average, inflation will also come into play over the next 15 years.

I am wary of taking Social Security into account because of all the scare-mongering that the trust is expected to go bankrupt in the 2030s. I am hoping that we will have a paid off home by the time we retire, and no further obligations towards our older kid, leaving only to provide for our younger (permanently disabled & unable to live independently) son. Between a paid off home, LIMITED travel (because our son cannot tolerate much moving and prefers a strict routine to keep him calm and anxiety-free), and not much income aside from property taxes, maintenance, insurance and frugal living, I am really hoping we can swing it. Running out of money in retirement or not leaving enough for our son to live off of after our time is my biggest worry / fear, which is one reason I'm quite panicked about retirement.




If you look at the Top 10 Holdings they are both loaded with FANGG stocks and not sure thats a good thing. I would put some into VYM and SCHD.


How much of the 500K would you advice we invest in VYM / SCHD? How much of the 20K contributions each year? I understand that you are not giving me investment advice, I am just curious to know what amount you'd recommend and how much we could expect it to generate in dividends (to be reinvested) in 2023?


Too many questions and variables here for a concise answer Safire. So just a few comments.

Of course investing $500k lump + $20k/yr for 15 years would "help a couple retire."

Whether it would be enough to live off the dividends (about 1.5%) is another question. You don't know how much all that VTI will be worth in 15 years. And living off only the dividends from VTI would be quite a low WR. To have the divs = the $60k/yr spending you want, you'd need $4 million. Pretty aggressive plan.

My FIRE portfolio is dominated by total stock market and similar low cost funds accumulated over decades. I didn't have a lump sum to begin with as you do, but I had more time. Took me about 30 years.

Good luck!

We were young and dumb, well into our early 40s. We have max 15 years left but I would like to learn more about your "strategy". How much do we start to invest for that time frame?


OP's plan is a start, but the $20k per year of additional money going into investments seems low for a couple.
401(k) plus Roth IRA contribution limits are now up to $30k per year or more if over 50.

Put aside $60k per year and increasing each year and you'll be in better shape...

Not going to happen. We can afford 20K max. 60K is a definite impossibility and it's disappointing to even read that number.


Impossible to tell the future, but one thing for sure is I would not be comfortable with this strategy because its lacking diversification. US equities could be in a slump for the next 5-10 years for all we know especially if the Fed abandons its easy money policy for a while. I would add some bonds, international, emerging market, and gold/silver and adjust accordingly based on economic conditions and policies.

We have some Treasury bonds that we purchase with tax returns every year. We also have a small portion in VTWEX, and 25% of his 401K in international. We don't have any emerging markets or gold / silver, and don't feel comfortable getting into them.

I would not lump sum such an amount unless it was already invested in mostly large cap US equities.

What makes you think today is the moment the market reached bottom, vs. tomorrow or next week or next month. Me, I can't fully see the future, so I would likely leg in keeping the rest in a T-Bill ladder to be allocated over the next 12 months.

I would also not just go VOO which is very tech heavy with 20.28% in Apple, Amazon, Google, Tesla, Amazon, Meta. Unless forced (e.g. limited choices in a 401k), why buy these in an ETF when you can just buy the individual holdings...which then gives you more control on taking losses or gains. Instead, for *some* of the money (note, not all -you can still do some VOO), consider equal weight ETF's like RSP (SP-500 equal weight) which would be much harder to replicate with individual equity purchases.

However, it's your money to invest how you decide. Good luck with your decision.

Why not lump sum? I thought we could not time the market. Did I get it wrong? Thank you for the heads-up on RSP, hadn't heard of that, will look into it.

FIRECalc suggests it is not a fool's dream. $60k spending, $500k portfolio, 45 year time horizon, 100% equities, retire in 2037 and add $20k a year from 2022 to 2037, all other default assumptions and that doesn't include any SS which most people are eligible to collect.

That -300K as a possible result is nerve wracking.

Another concern is that there might be additional equity losses before the bottom of the trough is here and if that happens the declne in value may adversely impact the results, so I would be careful.

Would you suggest DCA-ing the 500K over the next two years then? How do I handle this? I understand that you are not giving investment advice, but I am curious to know how you would suggest a solution for this (if any exist)? Thanks!


My "new" money is going into Vtsax (same as VTI) & Wellesley fund. I've been conservative for a long time and willing to take a little more risk. Wellesley is a bit more balanced and pays a touch more on dividends and less on the FAANG exposure. Plus a little bonds...

I believe he has some Wellesley in his 401K. We're currently wanting to both have our cake AND eat it, too. We are both very nervous about giving up on growth in order to generate more dividends eventually, as our son is still very young and growth now may help him as he ages and needs money over a lifetime. I will look into how much Wellesley we hold now - and see if we should maybe add to it. Thank you for the heads-up! Much appreciated.


I would not put new money into the stock market right now. The SP500 is down -19.7% since the high. In a recession the markets have been down (on average) something like -35%.

Not sure if market timing works but maybe we could invest 100K at a time into whatever fund we eventually decide to invest in, over a 2 year period.

You’d do better with SCHD and VYM. I have to disagree with the folks here about waiting, because market timing rarely works and time in the market works better.
SCHD and VYM both concentrate on companies that grow their dividends each year over a long period of time, even during some troubled economic times. Do some research and check them out.

Yes, will do. Thank you for the heads-up!



VYM trails VTI since it’s inception in Jan 2007, 8.32% vs 8.97%.

SCHD beats VTI since it’s inception in Jan 2012, 13.98% vs 13.19%. VYM does the worst at 12.14%. VOO is at 13.55%.

They’re all in the same ballpark.

SCHD has only been around since 2012? Then it's mostly only see a bull market, when VYM & VTI both existed through the Great Recession. I think that is something to consider when researching which to invest in. Thank you for the heads-up!


About 75% of my portfolio is VOO and VTI…. It’s a solid choice IMHO with a ~10% annualized avg return. I actually use them as tax loss harvesting partners because their returns are very similar.

How do they work as tax loss harvsting partners? Where can I learn more about this? Thank you for the reassurance. I really greatly appreciate it.
 
SCHD has only been around since 2012? Then it's mostly only see a bull market, when VYM & VTI both existed through the Great Recession. I think that is something to consider when researching which to invest in.


We are not in a bull market and haven’t been for nearly a year. Look how SCHD has performed this year compared to other funds. They’ve done better than most!
Also, remember it’s the underlying companies the fund invests in that is important. SCHD invests in companies with long track records of regularly increasing their dividends every year for long periods of time, some 50 years or more.
If you choose to DCA, I wouldn’t go more than a year. Personally, I would invest it all at the same time. Time in the market is more successful than timing the market. It can recover quickly leaving you behind and when is unpredictable.
 
Last edited:
Do you have a feel for how much your son will need annually once you are gone?

It seems like that might be the major component of your financial planning for the future.
 
How do they work as tax loss harvsting partners? Where can I learn more about this? Thank you for the reassurance. I really greatly appreciate it.

Assuming you have VOO (or VTI) in a taxable account and one of them is below the purchase price (like in this bear market)... you can sell the ETF that has lost value (either VOO or VTI) and immediately purchase the opposite ETF to take a capital loss (on paper). Been doing this all year and racked up a LOT of capital losses (on paper) so that I don't have to take capital gains in the many years to come :dance:
 
OP's plan is a start, but the $20k per year of additional money going into investments seems low for a couple.
401(k) plus Roth IRA contribution limits are now up to $30k per year or more if over 50.

Put aside $60k per year and increasing each year and you'll be in better shape...

Good point. My wife and I both max 401k/403b (20,500*2), We both max Roth IRA (6000*2), and we max our family HSA (7,300). ~60k min. We also put some in our brokerage account and our children's 529. We encourage family to give 529 contributions in lieu of toys since they seem to collect enough toys throughout the year.

60% of our equities are in MGK (FAANG of this 20% is in AAPL)
20% is in Midcap VOT
20% is in Smallcap VBK

SO far it has worked well, but its all about how much you put in. Gotta buy those dips when they come along.

Our average returns for the past 8 or so years are around 26 to 27%. Obviously this year took a dive, but it was a great opportunity to put another $70,000 into the market during the pullback.
 
We are not in a bill market and haven’t been for nearly a year. Look how SCHD has performed this year compared to other funds. They’ve done better than most!
Also, remember it’s the underlying companies the fund invests in that is important. SCHD invests in companies with long track records of regularly increasing their dividends every year for long periods of time, some 50 years or more.
If you choose to DCA, I wouldn’t go more than a year. Personally, I would invest it all at the same time. Time in the market is more successful than timing the market. It can recover quickly leaving you behind and when is unpredictable.

Another solid point. I never leave cash on the sidelines...waiting to DCA. If I have cash available, I invest it...immediately. If the market goes down the next few days, no big deal. I am in the market, collecting those DIVs.
 
Good point. My wife and I both max 401k/403b (20,500*2), We both max Roth IRA (6000*2), and we max our family HSA (7,300). ~60k min. We also put some in our brokerage account and our children's 529. We encourage family to give 529 contributions in lieu of toys since they seem to collect enough toys throughout the year.

60% of our equities are in MGK (FAANG of this 20% is in AAPL)
20% is in Midcap VOT
20% is in Smallcap VBK

SO far it has worked well, but its all about how much you put in. Gotta buy those dips when they come along.

Our average returns for the past 8 or so years are around 26 to 27%. Obviously this year took a dive, but it was a great opportunity to put another $70,000 into the market during the pullback.
I did similarly during my working years, though it took a while before I was able to max out my contributions.
But the OP finds this difficult to do, for untold reasons.
So will have to cruise at lower level with fingers crossed...
 
OP - I think its easy to overthink tactics and day to day decisions towards a long term goal. Especially in rocky markets. VOO, VTI, RSP, SCHD examples above are all good choices and over a long time don't seem to have big difference in yield. A couple of the debates:
->chasing dividends: Companies paying dividends tend to do so because they are not growing (ATT). Thus, balance of growth and dividend payers is worth considering.
-> U.S. vs Int'l stocks: S&P 500 sales are 65% US and 35% Int'l. For me, that is diversified enough. Has there been an era where Int't was actually better?

Time in the market, investing frequently and living below your means can often yield more results than asset picking for most people.

Learn to use a tool like FireCalc. Doing your own modeling will be much more useful than trying to get feedback in a forum.
 
->chasing dividends: Companies paying dividends tend to do so because they are not growing (ATT). Thus, balance of growth and dividend payers is worth considering.


This broad statement is simply not true. MSFT, AAPL, AVGO, HD, SBUX, ADP, LLY are growing companies, all pay dividends and increase them each year. AT&T is one company that fits your statement, but many don’t.
 
This broad statement is simply not true. MSFT, AAPL, AVGO, HD, SBUX, ADP, LLY are growing companies, all pay dividends and increase them each year. AT&T is one company that fits your statement, but many don’t.

My comment is about chasing high dividends. The companies you mention average a dividend yield similar to VOO.

You are helping make my point. We can argue about 1 broad ETF vs another, meanwhile the OP would be better off investing early and often and learning to do their own modeling.
 
Good point. My wife and I both max 401k/403b (20,500*2), We both max Roth IRA (6000*2), and we max our family HSA (7,300). ~60k min. We also put some in our brokerage account and our children's 529. We encourage family to give 529 contributions in lieu of toys since they seem to collect enough toys throughout the year.

60% of our equities are in MGK (FAANG of this 20% is in AAPL)
20% is in Midcap VOT
20% is in Smallcap VBK

SO far it has worked well, but its all about how much you put in. Gotta buy those dips when they come along.

Our average returns for the past 8 or so years are around 26 to 27%. Obviously this year took a dive, but it was a great opportunity to put another $70,000 into the market during the pullback.


You do realize that NOT all people on this forum are very high income earners who can actually manage to sock away as much as you and your wife have? I mentioned this already.

Secondly, what is your opinion on VOO / VTI? I'd rather invest in a broad fund rather than invest individual in mid cap / small cap etc although I have heard of people recommending small caps elsewhere. I just don't know how I feel about that (small cap tilt to a portfolio in hopes it will outperform broad-based funds in the next 15 years).
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom