tangomonster
Full time employment: Posting here.
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2006
- Messages
- 757
That professor, Andrew Yarrow, wasn't alone in being critical of our choice and lifestyle. Here is George Will's column from yesterday's newspaper:
Hoo-ha over the economy delights entitlement crowd | ajc.com
His major criticism:
So, this is a facet of today's hydra-headed "crisis" —- the man must linger in the labor force until, say, 62. That is the earliest age at which a person can, and most recipients do, begin collecting Social Security.
The proportion of people aged 55 to 64 who are working rose 1.5 percentage points from April 2007 to February 2008, during which the percentage of working Americans older than 65 rose two-tenths of one percentage point. The Journal grimly reports, "The prospect of millions of grandparents toiling away in their golden years doesn't square with the American dream."
Oh? The idea that protracted golden years of idleness is a universal right is a delusion of recent vintage. Deranged by the entitlement mentality fostered by a metastasizing welfare state, Americans now have such low pain thresholds that suffering is defined as a slight delay in beginning a subsidized retirement often lasting one-third of the retiree's adult lifetime.
In 1935, when Congress enacted Social Security, protracted retirement was a luxury enjoyed by a tiny sliver of the population. Back then, Congress did its arithmetic ruthlessly: When it set the retirement age at 65, the life expectancy of an adult American male was 65. If in 1935 Congress had indexed the retirement age to life expectancy, today's retirement age would be 75.
He thinks we are "deranged by an entitlement mentality!" Now, okay, maybe I'll cop to the deranged accusation , but entitlement mentality? I worked and I saved my money, allowing me to retire at 52. Where is the entitlement mentality? I'm not counting on SS. Yeah, I did feel entitled to a paycheck (albeit a small one) since I didn't work on a volunteer basis, but that's as far as it goes.
And yeah, maybe I'd still be working and want to work if I could have a job like George Will's (the salary and the relatively low demands of just putting out a column a week). Wonder if old George would have become "deranged by the entitlement mentality" and have wanted to opt out if he had had my job and my salary??
Hoo-ha over the economy delights entitlement crowd | ajc.com
His major criticism:
So, this is a facet of today's hydra-headed "crisis" —- the man must linger in the labor force until, say, 62. That is the earliest age at which a person can, and most recipients do, begin collecting Social Security.
The proportion of people aged 55 to 64 who are working rose 1.5 percentage points from April 2007 to February 2008, during which the percentage of working Americans older than 65 rose two-tenths of one percentage point. The Journal grimly reports, "The prospect of millions of grandparents toiling away in their golden years doesn't square with the American dream."
Oh? The idea that protracted golden years of idleness is a universal right is a delusion of recent vintage. Deranged by the entitlement mentality fostered by a metastasizing welfare state, Americans now have such low pain thresholds that suffering is defined as a slight delay in beginning a subsidized retirement often lasting one-third of the retiree's adult lifetime.
In 1935, when Congress enacted Social Security, protracted retirement was a luxury enjoyed by a tiny sliver of the population. Back then, Congress did its arithmetic ruthlessly: When it set the retirement age at 65, the life expectancy of an adult American male was 65. If in 1935 Congress had indexed the retirement age to life expectancy, today's retirement age would be 75.
He thinks we are "deranged by an entitlement mentality!" Now, okay, maybe I'll cop to the deranged accusation , but entitlement mentality? I worked and I saved my money, allowing me to retire at 52. Where is the entitlement mentality? I'm not counting on SS. Yeah, I did feel entitled to a paycheck (albeit a small one) since I didn't work on a volunteer basis, but that's as far as it goes.
And yeah, maybe I'd still be working and want to work if I could have a job like George Will's (the salary and the relatively low demands of just putting out a column a week). Wonder if old George would have become "deranged by the entitlement mentality" and have wanted to opt out if he had had my job and my salary??