donheff
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
There was a thread on withdrawal studies a while ago. You may find it interesting. Although studies were not perfect and may be a bit biased, withdrawing proportionately across all funds in the article didn't look bad at all.
http://www.early-retirement.org/for...ow-kirkpatrick-of-can-i-retire-yet-81129.html
This guy's papers are right on point. His updated paper would put a CAPE based decision (with no re-balancing) a bit ahead of proportional but probably not enough to make me lean that way in my 80s -- proportional would be good enough then.
On the first two suggestions, I am already there, fully understand what you are recommending, and am on-board. On the last point, I am getting toward that conclusion, especially for my doddering years. That was the only thing I was really interested in when I posted.You should approach this from an asset location standpoint.
Here's what I would do.
It would be more efficient to maintain all equity (or as much as possible)in after-tax accounts and the fixed income in the tax-deferred accounts. This will protect as much of the qualified dividends and cap gains distribution from being taxed as income as possible.
If RMDs are more than enough for expenses, you shouldn't be selling anything from your after tax accounts. Use the excess to buy equities in the after tax account.
For selling within the IRA, it doesn't really matter. Sell (and possibly buy) to maintain the total AA (after tax + IRA)
Yeh, that is what makes it fun. ...Obviously we're going to answer the question we want to answer, not the one you asked. You should know this by now...