audreyh1
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
Here is the source, and I'm thinking saying after 4 months sounds worse than in months 5 to 7.
My disappointment is the possibility of needing a booster every 6 months. If some other vaccine ends up having a longer lasting effect, perhaps I'll switch.
"Effectiveness declined gradually thereafter, with the decline accelerating after the fourth month to reach approximately 20% in months 5 through 7 after the second dose. Effectiveness against symptomatic infection was higher than effectiveness against asymptomatic infection but waned similarly. "
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2114114?query=featured_home
I don’t expect an every 6 months booster because I think, based on what virologists have said, that the wide time frame gives a much stronger response. And the vaccines were doing great with the initial and the alpha virus before the much more contagious, high viral load delta came along.
But if it come to annual boosters or whatever, fine with me. Minor issue.