Apocalypse . . .um . . .SOON said:
a'Hoye there (just a reminder) 'th--First, I want you to know that you caused my first ever two- handed spew. I was reading your mountain-stock portfolio response with a mouthful of Diet Lime Coke and out it came. My hand reflexively went up to protect the keyboard. It, the spew, ran down to my elbow, and I caught it in my cupped hand. I sat there puffing up with pride about the catch when some of it, the spew, ran between my fingers and fell on my pants. Dang!
So, Martha and I have a complex relationship. I guess one could say that it's a type of co-dependancy, somewhat like a woodtick and a leg. No, no, no. That's too simple. I guess the relationship is more like our government structure. I'm the Supreme Court, and Martha is the Executuve and the Legislative. It's my job to find Truth, wherever it might be hiding. Once found and explained, Martha's job is to interpret it and issue forth with laws and rules that EVERYONE has to follow, but mostly me. Some parrying and thrusting occasionally happens. For example, I know and have explained to her that $6.95 Monster Burger meals from Hardee's are bad, and they are bad universally in both time and location (except for large areas of Africa--but I'm not going there). So, when we go to Hardees and I order a Monster Burger meal, Martha rolls her eyes and looks at me as I attempt to avoid all contact. . . . I end up getting a small burger and diet pepsi. We both win but in a sometimes awkward fashion. At least that's her interpretation of events. But don't forget that all is contingent on the intial discovery of Truth. Sometimes both of us are paralysed for days just waiting for a Supreme Court decision.
So, yes, she always does what's right. IMO