HFWR
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
PIPO...
wildedge said:I just semi-ER'd (mostly due to boredom). My early retirement pays me a DB pension (inflation proofed) of $50k, plus family medical insurance (at no cost). I'm 53, my wife is 48. Married 15 years, 11-year old in the nest. I just took a tenure-track teaching position at our local university to sort of "ease" into retirement. My pay there is only $52k, lower than I've made for over 20 years. My wife still works, making $70k. She'll have a somewhat less lucrative DB pension (~$20k), beginning when she turns 55. We are debt free, including owning our modest home outright. It's a duplex and provides $15k/year in gross rental income, plus some nice writeoffs, so we live for better than free here, in terms of shelter and utilities, about a $6,000 net. Our income is close to $190k right now, but our expenses are about $50k/year, net of taxes. We have about $850k in investments, excluding the duplex. The big "BUT" is that we intend to bail out totally in 3 years and live just on my pension, rents, and a small draw on our portfolio of 2%/year. That will drop our income to about $80k for 4 years, until my wife's pension starts. I'm wondering if we should move to a lower cost of living place (the COL here is about 130% of US average). I've lived in Alaska most of my adult left, since I fled the rat race San Francisco in 1975. We'd like to travel a bit when we're fully retired so that may raise our expenses significantly. We are so cut off from the lower-48 life-style (such as it is), that I can't believe the cost of living numbers in the lower 48. Is it really so much cheaper there? Here we pay no state taxes, harvest a fair amount of our food from the wilderness, and our property taxes are only $3k/year on the $350,000 duplex. Our utilities are high, as are services, especially medical. But, as I said, the medical is covered. How can I get an idea of what our budget would look like in the lower 48? ACCRA and Runsheimer seems to be so skewed as to have no connection with my reality.
Ah yes - the life cycle of the human turd - one of my minor interests in ER.
What is the case for chlorine first, then areobic - before the lagoon
My swamp cane and cattails are double the height of the - other guys.
I think you quoted the wrong segement. You meant this one.REWahoo! said:Thanks for the free poop.
REW
I may not agree with JG's alternative path to ER, but it is nice to see an occasional message that opposes the high-volume, liberal/baby-boomers that spout the old Democrat talking points...
I don't trust ANY baby-boomer, especially a liberal-Democrat, with my well-being or future.
I've experienced too many examples of B4 (Baby-Boomers Behaving Badly).
wildedge said:I just semi-ER'd (mostly due to boredom). My early retirement pays me a DB pension (inflation proofed) of $50k, plus family medical insurance (at no cost). I'm 53, my wife is 48.
wildedge said:We are so cut off from the lower-48 life-style (such as it is), that I can't believe the cost of living numbers in the lower 48. Is it really so much cheaper there? Here we pay no state taxes, harvest a fair amount of our food from the wilderness, and our property taxes are only $3k/year on the $350,000 duplex. Our utilities are high, as are services, especially medical. But, as I said, the medical is covered. How can I get an idea of what our budget would look like in the lower 48? ACCRA and Runsheimer seems to be so skewed as to have no connection with my reality.
Welcome to the board, Wild!wildedge said:That will drop our income to about $80k for 4 years, until my wife's pension starts.
I'm wondering if we should move to a lower cost of living place (the COL here is about 130% of US average).
Fletch52 said:I suppose it is OK to ask the question here: What does the acronym FIRE stand for?
Fletch52
AJL said:Newly found site, looks interesting so far. Am probably one of the many that listened and relied for so many years on financial advisors. Would like to have a little more control over retirement investments. Am currently 57 and would like to retire sometime before they plant me in the ground. Unfortunately, do not have a pension to fall back on either. Investments are around 70k, and I am running out of "Time", like so many others in the same boat. I have read that having a financial person handling your investments is not such a good idea, and using the internet is more advantageous?? I could use some guidance here - in simplistic terms so I can understand. Thanks.
AJL said:Newly found site, looks interesting so far. Am probably one of the many that listened and relied for so many years on financial advisors. Would like to have a little more control over retirement investments. Am currently 57 and would like to retire sometime before they plant me in the ground. Unfortunately, do not have a pension to fall back on either. Investments are around 70k, and I am running out of "Time", like so many others in the same boat. I have read that having a financial person handling your investments is not such a good idea, and using the internet is more advantageous?? I could use some guidance here - in simplistic terms so I can understand. Thanks.
Welcome to the board, Eric.eric1821 said:Financially, we are ready for retirement, but I am still full of energy and in good health. I am 60 years old and would like to get some suggestion how to be a volunteer. I have never done any volunteer work before and I think with all the time I have, I can really help.
Eric
Martha said:I was on a board for many years that made microloans to start up businesses.
omni550 said:Martha,
This is a subject of interest to me. Could you please provide a little more information and/or some web links? Also, if I may ask, why are you no longer on the board?
Thanks,
omni