- Joined
- Apr 14, 2006
- Messages
- 23,111
Back in the days of Paul Volcker, it took 34 months to go from the peak of 14.2% to 3.5% inflation. We're not even at the one year point from the recent peak.
Sounds more like realism than cynicism to me. Prices will not fall because corporations are concerned about inflation.Industrial chemist since 1972, actually worked in the industry since 1966. My guess, price gouging by everyone involved, they had tons of stock. My guess, they will do it until they can't. Yea, getting very cynical in my old age.
Oldmike
It "feels" much higher, but my mix of goods and services is (admittedly) different from the CPI-U mix for calculation.
Some things lately have simply blown me away. One mechanic I've used because they are close wanted $95 to patch a nail hole in a tire. Say WHAT? (Got it free at a tire store apparently where it was originally purchased.) But airfare to the mainland was up 50% this year. That's an extra grand I wasn't planning on.
Insurance of all kinds is up - way up.
Heh, heh, Vanguard wants $25/account for mailing me stuff.
ON and on. Sorry, just venting - again.
and another placeOther costs, especially rent, are still climbing.
And NBC national news just said rent was up 8.7% year over year as well.Rent continued rising rapidly at 0.5% in May and 8.7% on a yearly basis.
Well, “these guys” have managed to cut inflation in half and get it to just above 4% without a recession. That’s quite an achievement, one which no one thought possible a year ago. I’m don’t remember the last time the Fed was able to do that.
Indeed, and the inflation we had was overwhelmingly caused by the fiscal spending, not monetary policy, but no one at the Fed complained.And they did it in an era of stimulative federal spending and lingering COVID related benefits.
Yes, 34 months and a world of hurt. Unemployment rose to over 10%, putting 11 million people out of work.Back in the days of Paul Volcker, it took 34 months to go from the peak of 14.2% to 3.5% inflation. We're not even at the one year point from the recent peak.
Let's remember he was saying over two years ago, that inflation was transitory and kept rates "near" zero. I "guess" transitory is really a relative term.
Of course I don't think I could have done any better. My crystal ball is really cloudy and I was never a good dart player.
Indeed, and the inflation we had was overwhelmingly caused by the fiscal spending, not monetary policy, but no one at the Fed complained.
Yes, 34 months and a world of hurt. Unemployment rose to over 10%, putting 11 million people out of work.
Back in the days of Paul Volcker, it took 34 months to go from the peak of 14.2% to 3.5% inflation. We're not even at the one year point from the recent peak.
Certain folks get overly positive reputations over time.
I see people say inflation "feels higher." This is usually when Gumby comes in and gives the numbers as they are, and he's right. The numbers don't lie.
But I think for us -- retirees -- the feeling comes from important factors. The first one being that many of us own our own home free and clear. Therefore, a full 1/3 of the CPI index does not apply to us. It doesn't matter what "shelter" does, for the most part, and how we feel about it.
We do care about services. We're at a time in life where maybe we let someone else cut the grass. Maybe some of our socialization is going out to have our hair done. We enjoy socializing by eating out. We care about the look of our home and hire people to fix it up.
We don't care about work clothes, and maybe a little less about gasoline due to a lack of commute.
We do care about insurance of all kinds. We care about eating out. We care about our automobiles. All are being hit with continued increases.
There's a "personal rate," and I'll add that there's a "demographic rate" too.
When you drill down the numbers looking for high hitter items, the one that pops out at me is motor vehicle insurance which is 2.0% month to month and 17.1% year over year. Ouch! No wonder threads have been opened for that item.
Car insurance is not the same as flour, which is also year over year at 17.1%. I mean, car insurance is a real, tangible, important portion of my spending each year. I notice it, and my eyes continue to pop out of my head.
I assume that's actual health services, but is that insurance negotiated prices, Medicare services pricing, non-insured pricing?Speaking of other CPI influences, like services, CNBC reported that healthcare dropped 20% ? How on earth is that possible?
Well, “these guys” have managed to cut inflation in half and get it to just above 4% without a recession. That’s quite an achievement, one which no one thought possible a year ago. I’m don’t remember the last time the Fed was able to do that.
Speaking of other CPI influences, like services, CNBC reported that healthcare dropped 20% ? How on earth is that possible?
Not sure, here's the blurb on it by Brian Sullivan. He mentioned it during his show
This includes the bls calc.
The April/May/June average is irrelevant. The calculation for Social Security purposes is done using the CPI-W index averages for the 3rd quarter (July/August/September) year over year. The 3rd quarter average for 3Q2022 was 291.901. What the 3Q2023 average will be is anyone's guess. We'll know in mid-October.So, is it possible (or even helpful) to do an estimate of the CPI-W change using the 2Q2022 3 month average vs 2Q2023 Estimated Average ??
CPI-W From BLS Website
April May June Average
2022 284.575 288.022 292.542 ~288.3
2023 297.730
https://www.ssa.gov/oact/STATS/cpiw.html
Figures don't lie but liars figure.I see people say inflation "feels higher." This is usually when Gumby comes in and gives the numbers as they are, and he's right. The numbers don't lie.
But to think that the CPI indexes reveal some kind of "truth" just because "numbers don't lie" is simply laughable.
https://www.bls.gov/cpi/factsheets/medical-care.htm#A2
Total benefits paid out in year T are subtracted from total premiums income in year T to get the retained earnings.
1. Total benefits paid out in year T are subtracted from total premiums income in year T to get the retained earnings.
The retained earnings is divided by total benefits to get a ratio of retained earnings to benefits.
2. The retained earnings is divided by total benefits to get a ratio of retained earnings to benefits.
The Retention-Benefit Ratio for year T is divided by the Retention-Benefit Ratio for year T-1 to get the retained earnings ratio.
3. The Retention-Benefit Ratio for year T is divided by the Retention-Benefit Ratio for year T-1 to get the retained earnings ratio.
The 1.09666 relative change, or 9.67 percent, is the annual increase in the retained earnings ratio. In other words, assuming benefits paid out has remained constant, the health insurance company has retained 9.67 percent more premiums income than in the previous year.
Spreading this annual change equally over 12 months is done by taking the twelfth root of the retained earnings ratio.
4. Spreading this annual change equally over 12 months is done by taking the twelfth root of the retained earnings ratio.
This 1.007719 relative, or 0.77 percent, is the monthly retained earnings relative.
Why would the Fed want to force a recession? I'm sure that if they could achieve their goals of stable prices, maximum employment and moderate interest rates without any recession, they would prefer to do that.My fear is that the Fed will keep raising to force a recession. ...
The April/May/June average is irrelevant. The calculation for Social Security purposes is done using the CPI-W index averages for the 3rd quarter (July/August/September) year over year. The 3rd quarter average for 3Q2022 was 291.901. What the 3Q2023 average will be is anyone's guess. We'll know in mid-October.
The April/May/June average is irrelevant. The calculation for Social Security purposes is done using the CPI-W index averages for the 3rd quarter (July/August/September) year over year. The 3rd quarter average for 3Q2022 was 291.901. What the 3Q2023 average will be is anyone's guess. We'll know in mid-October.