I have the superpower that allows me to glance at a post and skip over it if I want. I don't need anyone here to have a posting limit.
With 60 posts per year on your part, the responses to your question seem to contradict your theory.
As someone else who has been here a long time with a low post count, I would caution and remind that quantity does not necessarily equate with quality.
But are you weakened if the post mentions Kryptonite??I have the superpower that allows me to glance at a post and skip over it if I want. I don't need anyone here to have a posting limit.
Perhaps it would work to just ration vowels, so say, 1000 per month.
Perhaps it would work to just ration vowels, so say, 1000 per month.
Gr**t!
I w*ll tr* t* wr*t* *s*ng *nl* c*s*n*nts.
If anyone exceeds their daily limit, impose a copulsory one month as a moderator!As someone else who has been here a long time with a low post count, I would caution and remind that quantity does not necessarily equate with quality.
That said, no, don't limit posting. Just implement a user fee above a certain limit... ha
Would ER.org be a more pleasant place to visit if non-moderator accounts were limited to (for example) three posts per 24-hour period?
Limited resources tend to be more highly valued. Would the quality of posts go up as the quantity goes down?
I'm not going to state an opinion on this topic. I'm just floating the idea.
Just to muck around. Some people feel that everything needs to be modified.what would be the point of limiting posts?
+1. No dog approves of the way a fire hydrant smells when they first approach it..Just to muck around. Some people feel that everything needs to be modified.
Ha
+1. No dog approves of the way a fire hydrant smells when they first approach it..