Whenever I or sometimes another iconoclast brings this up in conversation the anti-fats, including doctors, immediately bring up tons of studies going back 40 years yadda yadda etc etc showing that saturated fat-is-worse-than-Hitler.
I concede, OK, there must be "studies that show..." but how can anybody really know for sure who's right? If you use simple observation you're hit with "pish-posh, anecdotal".(As if anecdotal is a synonym for "False"). If you cite the other studies that refute the conventionally accepted Fat-Hate studies, well, so now whose studies got da powah?
I recently did a 60 study writing down and accounting for every single bite of food. with a break-out of protein, carbs, Sat-Fat, Other-Fat and calories.
The upshot nearly ALL saturated fat taken in was from Nuts and olive oil, and the occasional avocado. Almost none came from eggs which I ate freely for the first time in like 30 yrs, and chicken. Even on days when I had some ground beef I ate more sat-fat from non-animal sources.
Gorging on olive oil is apparently just as bad or worse than eat meat. All the dietary information was taken from the label and/or at east one credible online source of nutritional info