It's really the only subject that's of interest to me on this forum. It drives me nuts that a group of people who desire to retire early, at someone else's expense, want to ruin a decent system that serves the masses well by going single-payor, all in a vain attempt to be able retire 10 years early instead of working 'till age 65.
Wow. Now I get you. You're pissed off that people here are retired early!
But what is with the "at someone else's expense" comment? Who else is paying for the person's retirement except themselves? Through their pension or their savings? Also, you characterize ER as a "vain attempt" which also indicates you are disparaging those who live below their means or save prodigiously so that they can retire from work that is not satisfying, too stressful, or whatever. This is a person's choice. You are way over the top here.