MichealKnight
Full time employment: Posting here.
- Joined
- May 2, 2019
- Messages
- 520
I am envious
I don't think anyone has monopoly on loving their kids, or caring about the public good. I don't think anyone wants 'less' for kids or even society and we all have out opinions.
I for one, *applaud* all entities - especially schools who are wiling to take the lump and shut down but for online instruction.
I fear my district will give a "choice" - between 100% online, 100% in-person and 50-50. My beef with that is - if one doesn't go 100%..... their kids would be somewhat behind academically and socially versus peers. I feel like I have to choose between letting them fall behind - OR exposing them to the virus and I get frustrated. If someone starts a rumor on 'Facebook' or somewhere about a potential shooter - these schools shut down and send kids home. And now - we HAVE a proven shooter - a virus- yet districts wanna dabble in live instruction. Funny - some towns will shut down bars and restaurants ( I support)....yet somehow they feel they can control 10-12 kids for 6 hours in a row during school.
My dream: SHUT IT DOWN. Depending on grade level - ok I'd do online learning but if it means REPEATED the year...*gasp*...yes....*wasting a year*..... maybe we in Instant-Coffee-Point-and-Click-Prime-Delivery America can learn to slow down. God forbid it would be a lesson our. kids have rarely been exposed to.
*Many households - both work. That is nothing but honorable and I understand they need school as a daycare. Fine - raise my taxes if needed and keep school open in *that* capacity if you must.
*School meals - some families depend on school for kid's meals. Again - I sympathize and want. NO hiccups. Our district has kid meals available for pick-up - I'm all for it and would support bolstering it .
My daughter starts middle-school this year. There is already trepidation about 'sitting in', and cliques, and mean girls, etc. I fear that if I elect to keep her home - or even do 50-50 - - then she's not going to fit in with the girls who have already formed school-bus friends or lunch-time friends, etc. Also my wife has asthma so we've been 100% quarantine since March. I fear my kids bring it home - and let's pretend kids live thru it fine - but what of my wife?
As of now - I'm not willing to risk "ok, so a child died. But at least she got socialization". I'm not willing to say "ok, so a child lost her or his Mom or Dad....but hey, at least he is caught up on Algebra".
Not worth it.
I'm seriously leaning towards skipping the year, doing the online thing - and if we feel behind socially/academically - I'll just have to enroll in a private school and stay back a grade to get parity.
Yes, let's say there's only a 0.5% chance of a kid dying from Covid in school.
In a district with say - 10,000 kids - that's only 50 dead plus many more parents exposed and potentially recovered kids having health problems later on.
Only 50 dead.
One man's opinion: It's nuts.
Take a timeout be it 3 months, 6 months or even a year.
My 8 year old special-needs son has been home all this time..... funny the things he's picked up from CNBC, from playing monopoly. Both kids have been doing home- book reports, oral speaking, etc - they may not be learning core stuff - but it's hardly been a waste of time.
Best of luck to all families.
My vote: Stay the heck home.
I don't think anyone has monopoly on loving their kids, or caring about the public good. I don't think anyone wants 'less' for kids or even society and we all have out opinions.
I for one, *applaud* all entities - especially schools who are wiling to take the lump and shut down but for online instruction.
I fear my district will give a "choice" - between 100% online, 100% in-person and 50-50. My beef with that is - if one doesn't go 100%..... their kids would be somewhat behind academically and socially versus peers. I feel like I have to choose between letting them fall behind - OR exposing them to the virus and I get frustrated. If someone starts a rumor on 'Facebook' or somewhere about a potential shooter - these schools shut down and send kids home. And now - we HAVE a proven shooter - a virus- yet districts wanna dabble in live instruction. Funny - some towns will shut down bars and restaurants ( I support)....yet somehow they feel they can control 10-12 kids for 6 hours in a row during school.
My dream: SHUT IT DOWN. Depending on grade level - ok I'd do online learning but if it means REPEATED the year...*gasp*...yes....*wasting a year*..... maybe we in Instant-Coffee-Point-and-Click-Prime-Delivery America can learn to slow down. God forbid it would be a lesson our. kids have rarely been exposed to.
*Many households - both work. That is nothing but honorable and I understand they need school as a daycare. Fine - raise my taxes if needed and keep school open in *that* capacity if you must.
*School meals - some families depend on school for kid's meals. Again - I sympathize and want. NO hiccups. Our district has kid meals available for pick-up - I'm all for it and would support bolstering it .
My daughter starts middle-school this year. There is already trepidation about 'sitting in', and cliques, and mean girls, etc. I fear that if I elect to keep her home - or even do 50-50 - - then she's not going to fit in with the girls who have already formed school-bus friends or lunch-time friends, etc. Also my wife has asthma so we've been 100% quarantine since March. I fear my kids bring it home - and let's pretend kids live thru it fine - but what of my wife?
As of now - I'm not willing to risk "ok, so a child died. But at least she got socialization". I'm not willing to say "ok, so a child lost her or his Mom or Dad....but hey, at least he is caught up on Algebra".
Not worth it.
I'm seriously leaning towards skipping the year, doing the online thing - and if we feel behind socially/academically - I'll just have to enroll in a private school and stay back a grade to get parity.
Yes, let's say there's only a 0.5% chance of a kid dying from Covid in school.
In a district with say - 10,000 kids - that's only 50 dead plus many more parents exposed and potentially recovered kids having health problems later on.
Only 50 dead.
One man's opinion: It's nuts.
Take a timeout be it 3 months, 6 months or even a year.
My 8 year old special-needs son has been home all this time..... funny the things he's picked up from CNBC, from playing monopoly. Both kids have been doing home- book reports, oral speaking, etc - they may not be learning core stuff - but it's hardly been a waste of time.
Best of luck to all families.
My vote: Stay the heck home.