Is it testosterone that makes one greedy when others are fearful, and vice versa?
Some years ago, I read an article that claimed women made better traders than men, as the latter could not keep a cool head. But I am a man (and also like women a lot ). What traits I share with most women are that I do not care about spectator sports nor fast cars, and preferring drama to action movies, etc...
OK, so now I'm nervous....
Getting nervous?
Yep.
OK, so now I'm nervous....
(Emphasis added.)The following is my fears of what may occur, hopefully I am wrong on this.
At some point shortly the market will cease going down, as most of the weak hands have been shaken out.
As the promises to fix the problem by the present administration will overshadow concerns of the potential ineffectiveness. However by fall, the need to sell US treasury notes for the actual promises given will be showing up as a massive global strain while at the same time state governments will be reviewing their upcoming state budgets and those will be bleeding red ink, causing a crisis in municipal and government bonds.
At this point faith in the recovery will evaporate and with it the stock market prices as they collapse in the fourth quarter to a new bear market low. The ability of spending a few trillion dollars will come as a process that was able to defer but not prevent the implosion of 50 trillion plus in imploding debt assets. However, for a time I think we will be better...
The scary part is how many names you never see posting here anymore.
Did they go back to work or did they 'win' the game?
No, I am not perfect, as a matter of fact to do this you better be willing to admit when you are wrong. I am not looking to be perfect, I am looking to be conservative actually.OK, I am ready to sell everything now.
Hold on, I just found another one of your posts from that thread: (Emphasis added.)
So it appears you aren't perfect?
I was more thinking that several guys here (I'm included) seem to delight in beating the market. Timing can be used or not. At least I think the ones I read here are men from certain clues or maybe avatars.
I'm not sure I've read a woman's post here about timing the market or famous moments in personal investing. But I could be very wrong about this and all one of these ladies has to do is step up and prove me wrong. Go ahead, make my day. I know I'm on very thin ice here and please nobody should take me too seriously.
I too don't care about spectator sports (well I did watch the Super Bowl though) nor fast cars, and prefer dramas to action movies, and women (look but don't touch).
Thank you, Running Man. And please keep us updated as to what you see in the markets and what you are doing, as some of us are interested. For those folks who are not interested, or can't/won't tolerate any form of market timing, you are free to ignore this thread if you want to.
I understand your feelings as I'm sort of mid-negative myself which is why I'm down from 60/40 to 50/50 as of December 1st. OK so I'm not so extreme and being still exposed makes me conflicted ... do I hope for more down so I can get back in at 60/40 and declare myself smart ... or do I hope for continued up and wish I had stuck with 60/40? Some of us cannot win in our own minds.
In the corrections of 1962 and 1987, the time from peak to a good sell point was 3 months. Will history repeat? You can easily see charts of this on Yahoo looking at the SP500 (^GSPC symbol).
One thought for you. I believe it is hard to declare yourself on these social network forums because you inevitably get people who are going to be negative towards your move. In this case it is probably because people have a vested interest in seeing the opposite outcome and they become defensive. This is a natural human instinct and some of us cannot help ourselves. But do you want to hear these negatives? I would not.
A final question if it is not too intrusive. What is your plan on getting back into stocks and what percentage would you move? Thanks for sharing.
Why would you hope you're wrong?
If this is in taxable account, you'll also be lower due to the tax on your capital gains that has to be paid. And depending on health care subsidy, that gain may also push you over the cliff which would also lower your results. But hey, for every seller there's a buyer, one of them will be correct. Sometimes both end up being correctWhen I decide to get back in, I would aim to get 25% back in as soon as possible.
Getting back in when the market has fallen is quite easier than when the market is heading up, most people see the value when the market is significantly down, as I stated one must be willing to admit they are wrong, I expect the market to respond in short order here to the down side, a new stock market high would mean I was wrong in my assessment and I would get my 25% back in. As that is 4-5% higher than my sell point, that would lower my portfolio results by one - 1.5% percent approximately this year, than if I never would have done this.
When I decide to get back in, I would aim to get 25% back in as soon as possible.
Getting back in when the market has fallen is quite easier than when the market is heading up, most people see the value when the market is significantly down, as I stated one must be willing to admit they are wrong, I expect the market to respond in short order here to the down side, a new stock market high would mean I was wrong in my assessment and I would get my 25% back in. As that is 4-5% higher than my sell point, that would lower my portfolio results by one - 1.5% percent approximately this year, than if I never would have done this.
Market timers indeed avoid worst days, but more importantly, they miss out on best days too where most of your returns will actually come from. Just look at what happens if you only miss 10 best days. Your overall return goes from 9.8% to 6.10% and if you miss 30 best days, it's money in the mattress.
BUT, if you have enough for your own lifestyle, a good buffer, and still do not care, as one gets older capital preservation and sleeping well is a lot more important. at least it is to me. We could handle a 12% inflation for 15 - 20 years and still not need to worry.
That has been back-tested and it doesn't quite work out that way either.Now, this chart says that those 10 days are mostly within 2 weeks of the worst days.... so, if you want to market time keep all money in cash... when the market takes a big tumble invest everything and wait two weeks... then sell everything and wait for the next time...
I just don't see that. IMO the past few weeks have returned us to a more stable market with somewhat high valuations, suddenly realistic interest rates and perhaps some healthy, low inflation on the horizon. Back to normal IMO.
Well, I just don't see that.
Two weeks does not cure all problems.
My crystal ball shows taper tantrums with each rate hike going forward. The only question is which one will push us over the cliff?
I'm just struggling to see where a market event of 'epic proportions' is on the horizon.