Brewer,
I don't know your local weather, but our first post-natal vacation was our local downtown. We barely made it.
If this is your first baby trip, the amount of support gear will make Everest expeditions & D-Day invasions look like a walk in the park. And if you're planning baby air travel, your lifelong friends will pay extra for seats at the opposite end of the plane from you. The worst nightmare is your fourth wakeup (at about 2:30 AM) when you desperately need (insert vital baby supply here) and you realize that you left it at home on the changing table. Long car trips are also impractical when breastfeeding is involved. (Draw your own picture here.)
So travel the shortest distance for suitable weather, preferably leaving when you're rested and just before the kid falls asleep. Leave plenty of schedule flexibility to abort for vital supplies or even abandon the whole idea due to excessive sleep deprivation. No matter how comfortable that front-loading Snuggli seems, bring the stroller.
If you do decide to travel by air, bring at least two diapers per hour of air travel. Then double it. Then sneak in a couple extra diapers where your spouse won't notice, but will be very glad you did.
When you arrive, go for the easy stuff. Try the zoo, the local kiddie park, the hotel pool, or even the beach (no water immersion necessary).
cc,
I have to agree & disagree with you. Vegas has plenty to see & do without gambling, and the eye candy never ends. However Vegas casinos are unsuitable for kids due to their second-hand smoke, let alone the noise levels. But I bet babies would be a great distraction to most blackjack dealers!
Cut-Throat,
I can't disagree that Vegas evokes strong opinions, but I've been to worse places and I don't make fun of any of your chosen fishing spots!
On the gambling aspect, my best feedback is that you haven't read enough to develop an informed opinion. Even at $5/hand, with 60 hands/hour it's no strain to chew through $1000/day in blackjack progression bets. Three-quarters of that money may be the same $25 of chips. Progressive betting coupled with card-counting puts your edge at about 0.5-1% (depending on other table factors), which after four hours of average play would net you a whopping $10-$15. Winning at Vegas is just like winning at stock-picking-- it's hard work even when you optimize the odds.
I agree that casinos put most of the odds in their favor. Blackjack is a major exception and video poker is an even bigger exception. The reason the casinos put up with these two potentially money-losing games is because they attract far more uninformed losers than dedicated winners. It's not as good as it used to be (mid-1990s) and it'll never be the golden age of the 70s-- but the odds can still go to the proficient, patient, and sober gambler. If you don't believe me then take a look at all the legitimate, credible books & strategy cards that the casinos sell in THEIR OWN STORES.
But you'd need a $25 minimum bet to attract the attention of the comp crews (and to reach that $5K/day). For all but the most dedicated, the downside risk just isn't worth the reward unless you're fascinated by the challenge and willing to ride with the swing of the probabilities. I've never played video poker but my understanding from reading the books is that $5K/day is easy to reach, although you don't get back much more than you put in unless you choose a machine with a good payoff and perhaps some additional comps or prizes.
I don't agree with your opinion of this board's posters. In fact, ERs are one of the few segments of society who have the time, discipline, and commitment to devote to profitable gambling. I see it as just one more facet of a diversified investment portfolio and part of everyone's entertainment budget. I can happily while away an hour or two a day practicing card-counting and progressive betting on my computer, and I wish I'd had more Vegas gambling time to see if I'm as brilliant as my software claims I am. But the surf there is lousy, I hate the second-hand smoke, and there are other things that I'd rather do more.