Urban/Suburban/Rural Retirement?

Er Ah

Why not get into ER - and then and then - do all of them.

A long enough ER and you can squeeze in several lifestyles - before one gets Tooooo old.

heh heh heh heh heh - had a yard to mow last in 1979 and now back in the burbs 2005 - with a yard.
 
unclemick2 said:
Er Ah

Why not get into ER - and then and then - do all of them.

A long enough ER and you can squeeze in several lifestyles - before one gets Tooooo old.

That sounds like a damn good suggestion unclemick2! Thanks.
 
My perfect plac, sorta in order:

No need for a car. Public transport that's clean and well run.
Nice body of water nearby, especially if it's a thong required beach.
Lots of ethnicity, shops, restuarants, and hey, even the ethnics.
Lots of museums, theater, shops, clubs, libraries, seminars, etc.
Lots of hot young honeys to keep an old man's eyesight worth having.
So that usually means colleges, musical schools, theater training, etc.
Lots and lots of weirdos. Bums, street kooks, mimes, old hippies, young tarts.

Hey, if Paris could be relocated to Baja, ahhhhh but it's impossible.(em-poh-see-bla)
 
Jarhead* said:
ESRBob: Paradise is about 90 miles north of Sacramento, in the foothills, and about 20 miles from Chico. Mostly retired folks, with a population of about 40,000.

Jarhead,
Very familiar with Chico -- congrats on living in such a fine area. I have visited the campus on business (former life) and my brother (in Mt Shasta) and his family would meet us in Chico as a midway point when we'd fly out from the East Coast to Sacramento to visit other family.

Glad you liked the book and thanks for agreeing to be profiled.
 
My ideal place, I think, would be a secluded house on a lot of land that seems in the middle of nowhere, but is still a quick drive to larger cities, and also with hospitals, grocery stores, gas stations, etc not TOO far away.

Where I'm at right now is kinda like that...old farmhouse sitting on 4 1/4 acres. And our end of the street recently got down-zoned to keep new construction and subdivision to a minimum. DC's about 20 minutes away, and so is Annapolis. Baltimore's about a half hour away.

And it does seem nice and secluded and quiet. During non-rush hour times, at least. And if you ignore the McMansion orchard up on the hill. Oh, and the spot where the road goes from a 30 foot right-of-way to 4 lanes and a sidewalk! ::)
 
Yeah, Andre-
That seems to be the trend -- once you find a paradise like that you notice that it is filling up with concrete, new roads, mcmansions and so forth. Next thing you know they're doing a re-assessment, building a new school, banning horses and hiring more cops with fancy early retirement benefits. (hmm... maybe there is a new path to ER in almost-paradise there for some of our young dreamers...)
 
One stop light, two Post Offices, 4 Hospitals within a half hour, closest is 10 minutes, 3 hours North of Buffalo.

Most new comers are 50+, Semi or early Retired

Housing Costs increasing, $300,000 for an 1,800 sq.ft Bungalow.

http://www.thebluemountains.ca/
 
One observation: I cannot precisely extract the info but it looks like no one has chosen option "B" =the suburbs as their ideal retirement. As I read the numbers something like more than 50% of the US population actually lives in the suburbs, not the city, small towns or rural. Is there something about this popular living choice that doesn't work for retirement? If retirees are fighting to not live there why do so many live there in the first place? Is the "American Dream" a retirement nightmare?

yakers, who lives in Pasadena which was once a small town, then a suburb and now is part of the vast LA conglomeration, but does have subway/public transportation.
 
Andre, that's pretty much why I plan to retire where I am now. Neighborhood is as built up as is allowed, I live in a watershed area for the citys drinking water, rules are very strict so I'm assured of it staying very rural but yet close to everything I want.
 
I plan on staying in the suburbs where I live now. It is pretty close to downtown still, so it is bordering on urban, but the 1/3 acre lot on a lake tells me it's suburban. Whatever it is, we'll be staying here or in this section of town at least.

We have kids too. The schools are top-notch. Good quality of life. Schools, shopping, parks, libraries, and restaurants are all within walking distance. Nice, socioeconomically and ethnically diverse neighborhood and area (I don't want my kids growing up in whitey suburbia where the rich folks live :) ). Dozens of Mexican/Indian/Thai/Vietnamese/Chinese/Italian ethnic restaurants within a few miles. Traffic ain't too bad most of the time. The ten-lane major highway 1/4 mile from my house isn't too bad. It's usually drowned out by the sound of geese, ducks, herons, birds, frogs, crickets, etc from the lake.

I might consider moving to a cheap foreign country at some point in the future. Probably for a few years at the most though. Suburbia is just too nice for me.
 
yakers said:
Is there something about this popular living choice that doesn't work for retirement?

I live in a suburban area in NJ. I am on a cul-de-sac by a lake and it is a reasonably pleasant place to live. I hate moving. But when I retire I may well end up moving. Why? It is expensive to live here. Unless I have an awfully large pile of capital, it will be hard to support the relatively high cost of living here.
 
yakers said:
One observation: I cannot precisely extract the info but it looks like no one has chosen option "B" =the suburbs as their ideal retirement.
I think we chose that option by default when we found our "dream house". Part of that dream is having a nice place to raise a kid, although hopefully that project wraps up in the next five years.

Our house backs on a gulch that gives the illusion of rural greenbelt. We're overlooking a highway bridge with some traffic noise but the subdued rumble blends in nicely with the gulch farmer's fighting cocks roosters.  The highway bridge is supposed to be expanded in the next five years but it's a $125M bogey that keeps losing its budget battle.  We're surrounded by houses but the neighborhood's built out at 15,000 homes and heavily regulated by a homeowner's association.  We're at the end of a cul-de-sac and an adjacent lot holds a small sewage pumping station-- best neighbor we've ever had.  Because of the weird layout at the end of the street we have a 13,000 sq ft lot-- huge for Oahu-- but most of it is steeply sloped and only suited for fruit trees.

Despite being surrounded by suburbia we're still in a transportation black hole.  Our home is two miles away from the nearest traffic-light intersection.  We're 10 minutes by car from the local shopping center (40 minutes on foot) and unfortunately the nearest bus stop is nearly the same distance.  There's a neighborhood trolley that makes stops a little closer to home, or we could pay for Handi-Van pickup service.  So I guess this "dream house" could turn into a problem in the next 50 years.  If I hang up the car keys in 2050 I'm gonna have to figure out another way to get my longboard to the beach...

But we based our decision on the house & schools, not so much the convenience of the local infrastructure.  We enjoy the ambiance, the neighborhood kids get along well, and the high school is only a couple miles away.  Right now the advantages outweigh all the potential drawbacks.
 
Here's a new MarketWatch article on the top 15 places to retire if you like living near a metro area. The list actually includes a total of 30 locations:

Top towns in 15 metro areas -- if money's no object

* In the Boston metro area: New Castle, N.H.
* In the New York metro area: Point Lookout, N.Y.
* In the Philadelphia area: Newton Square, Pa.
* In the Washington-Baltimore area: Pikesville, Md.
* In the Atlanta area: Decatur, Ga.
* In the Miami-Fort Lauderdale area: Palm Beach, Fla.
* In the Detroit area: Farmington, Mich.
* In the Chicago area: Lake Forest, Ill.
* In the Dallas-Ft. Worth area: Highland Park, Texas.
* In the Houston area: West University Place, Texas.
* In the Minneapolis-St. Paul area: Edina, Minn.
* In the Phoenix area: Fountain Hills, Ariz.
* In the Seattle area: Mercer Island, Wash.
* In the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose area: Belvedere-Tiburon, Calif.
* In the Los Angeles area: Bradbury, Calif.

Top towns that are also a good value

* In the Boston metro area: Sandwich, Mass.
* In the New York metro area: Southbury, Conn.
* In the Philadelphia area: Jenkintown, Pa.
* In the Washington-Baltimore area: Boyce, Va.
* In the Atlanta area: Monticello, Ga.
* In the Miami-Fort Lauderdale area: North Palm Beach, Fla.
* In the Detroit area: Rochester, Mich.
* In the Chicago area: Michigan City, Ind.
* In the Dallas-Ft. Worth area: Lindale, Texas.
* In the Houston area: Bellaire, Texas.
* In the Minneapolis-St. Paul area: Paynesville, Minn.
* In the Phoenix area: Sun City, Ariz.
* In the Seattle area: Greenbank, Wash.
* In the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose area: Martinez, Calif.
* In the Los Angeles area: Yucaipa, Calif.
 
I see Mpls/St. Paul, where I would prefer to retire, is a money is no object area.

Ford announced recently that it is closing the Ford Ranger plant in St. Paul. I believe that plant employes a couple of thousand people. The spin off employment has to be pretty high. I wonder if this closing, slated for 2008, will effect housing prices.
 
When we moved last year we wanted to stay in the west in a place with a warm, dry climate that had the amenities of a bigger city without all the hassles. Moved to Sedona, AZ. Love it.

Housing is high but still lower for comparable places in northern California where we came from.  Sedona is a cultured, progressive "town" that seems bigger than its claimed 12,000 or so permanent residents. Downside: traffic congestion on the two main streets. However, neighborhoods are very, very quiet. Safe. Scenery is stunning and we are able to walk to almost everything: spa, most stores, many restaurants, the post office. Uptown area where we are is an ideal location. Close to everything (town is a five-minute walk down a gentle hill).

You want snow? Flagstaff is only 28 miles up the hill from us. Prescott is 60 miles south. That's another place we looked at but it seems to be growing too fast without a whole lot of smart planning.
 
mb said:
Yakers,

You didn't mention if you wanted to stay in CA? If so I would look at Chico (mentioned by Jarhead and the Other Michael) and Davis. Both university towns. You just have to be able to put up with the central valley temperatures in the summer. (That is why I would think twice before moving there.) Davis isn't that far from the Sacramento river delta.

MB

MB,

I am familiar with Davis, my older son lived there and recently moved to Placerville where he works and where his wife's family lives. Nice areas. While I would just as soon leave CA there is the little issue of our grand daughter in Placerville and my wife says we're gonna get there regularly and I expect younger son will be in a state schoold like UC San Diego. So I suppose I could chose anywhere if I could afford the transportation costs.
 
My perfect plac, sorta in order:

No need for a car. Public transport that's clean and well run.
Nice body of water nearby, especially if it's a thong required beach.
Lots of ethnicity, shops, restuarants, and hey, even the ethnics.
Lots of museums, theater, shops, clubs, libraries, seminars, etc.
Lots of hot young honeys to keep an old man's eyesight worth having.
So that usually means colleges, musical schools, theater training, etc.
Lots and lots of weirdos. Bums, street kooks, mimes, old hippies, young tarts.

Hey, if Paris could be relocated to Baja, ahhhhh but it's impossible.(em-poh-see-bla)

You might want to check out Rio or some of the other coastal spots in Brazil, my friend. According to the field reports I have been getting, it fits all of your criteria.

Cheers,

Gypsy
 
ESRBob said:
Yelnad;
care to give us a hint about where this paradise is?

But if you have to get your Italian food in an Olive Garden, that sounds a little iffy... :p

My personal paradise is outside of State College, PA, home of Penn State University. We have better than Olive Garden :) but not too many.
 
Thx, Yelnad;
I'm still in suburbia (NY) which I like, but I can foresee the day when it will become too expensive -- taxes here are crushing, but the schools are great, and everything works, is safe, and looks nice.
 
Back
Top Bottom