bosco said:
how was the invasion of Iraq in the US interest? Other than the stolen oil, I mean?
Well, heres a plausible theory, although i'm in no way an apologist or supporter of the whole thing, just explaining. and there were many better ways to accomplish the end goal.
The reason why we didnt whack hussein in the first gulf war is that he provided several very useful functions. Oddly several are at odds with the way we repainted him for the purpose of demonizing the wartime opponent.
Hussein didnt allow terrorists to congregate or operate in his country. One of his greatest fears was an organized armed insurgency overturning his government.
His party opposed and suppressed the hard line muslims in his country and opposed the ones in neighboring Iraq.
Quite simply he made for a nice buffer between "bad" countries and the "good" countries that we get oil from and have strong alliances with.
And he was tough on insurgents, troublemakers and other riff raff in the country. As we've seen, they dont respond well to kid glove treatment. Hell, we have the greatest army ever deployed on earth and we cant contain the mess over there.
He got some wrong signals, grabbed kuwait, wouldnt back out and we had to whack his pee-pee. After that the period of sanctions and military pressure, along with losses during the war, led to him becoming nearly powerless.
As a function of having less strength in his own country, he had to become more savage with the internal trouble makers and try to fake out the neighboring threats by pretending he had WMD's.
Figuring he was going to fall at any time and create a situation of great uncertainty in a region critical to our economic and political interests, we used his WMD BS and a couple of other bits of fabricated horsecrap to move into the region before that happened, probably figuring we'd get an easy win, set up another semi-puppet government based on our democracy, and things would be stable again. Sell it to the US population that we're toppling a monster that was behind 9/11 and had nukes or gas that he planned to use on us and its an easy deal.
Unfortunately we had a lousy plan for the part starting after we "defeated" the nearly defenseless iraqi military and ending with a stable iraqi government, police force and army. Apparently we know a lot about breaking things, but we suck at making an effective government. Which really surprises the hell out of me :
We're lousy students of history. The Persian/Mesopotamian region hasnt changed much in 1000 years, except they have better weapons and hate each other and their neighbors more due to the increased history of mutual death and destruction. Many leaders and invaders have tried to bring order through many different approaches, none particularly successful. Dividing the different groups geographically didnt even work...the romans lost a lot of soldiers just trying to buffer the different geographies.
If it didnt happen that a big chunk of the worlds oil supply was sitting in the middle of this (which may be as much a cause of the problems as a cosmic accident) and had we decided to stick israel in central Pennsylvania instead of the middle of the whole thing, we'd probably be enjoying the tales of ongoing death and destruction and not care one bit.