For some reason this song comes to mind
.
.
.
.
So it could be that all this chart shows is that austerity was metered out to the countries that needed it the most. And that Greece among all the countries, chose not to participate in its own recovery.
Austerity in itself is too vague to say anything useful about.
The only difference with reality in the Greece bailout is that the German never gets the 100 Euro note back!
ProbablyCould the reason be that I posted earlier, here?
Please don't tell Paul Krugman this, he'll have an aneurism. He's been Johnnie-one-note on his "austerity is dumb" campaign for so long that I don't know where he'll find anything to write about as the situation becomes more clear.Also, the UK is missing (I know, this is eurozone data). They famously did the austerity thing and are growing faster than anyone else now.
NL was hard hit by the housing crisis (price drops >20%, level of mortgage debt was unsustainable there, and is being paid off). It is now growing better & faster than Belgium even though it cut much deeper than the chart implies. Belgium is lagging in reforms and paying for it today, it escaped the housing crisis early on since lending was always alot more restrictive.
+1. I suppose "austerity" and "reform" are both loaded terms chosen by people with different viewpoints about the way forward. What is important is whether the system is fixed so that incentives are improved for activity that produces goods and services of net higher value than the starting conditions. Putting euros into the system just so they can be passed around and everybody takes some is not going to help Greece improve in the long term.Austerity in itself is too vague to say anything useful about. What is important is where you cut, invest, and more importantly reforms. Broken window fallacy comes to mind here too
Please don't tell Paul Krugman this, he'll have an aneurism.
It takes two to tango, so the lenders should have never made the loans to a risky borrower. They are just going to have to write off most of it.
Also, the UK is missing (I know, this is eurozone data). They famously did the austerity thing and are growing faster than anyone else now.
NL was hard hit by the housing crisis (price drops >20%, level of mortgage debt was unsustainable there, and is being paid off). It is now growing better & faster than Belgium even though it cut much deeper than the chart implies. Belgium is lagging in reforms and paying for it today, it escaped the housing crisis early on since lending was always alot more restrictive.
Finland spent more and shrank (!). The Nokia implosion is no small contributor to that. Once 4% of GDP and 70% of its stock market by value, now just a blip.
The main thing the chart does show in my view is that Greece is a strong outlier.
Austerity in itself is too vague to say anything useful about. What is important is where you cut, invest, and more importantly reforms. Broken window fallacy comes to mind here too.
+1I might get flamed for this, but I'd like to see this thread move to a higher plain. Let's keep our political bias in check.
I might get flamed for this, but I'd like to see this thread move to a higher plain. Let's keep our political bias in check.
... "The desire to help in such situations, whether motivated by politics or not, has already been the undoing of Greece’s attempts to reform its pension system. In 2012, under the terms of its previous bailout deal, the Greek government promised to close one of the most infamous holes in this system: the list of so-called “arduous” professions, whose workers are allowed to retire years and sometimes decades earlier than the European average. Over the years, this list had grown to include some 600 professions—among them opera singers, hairdressers and television anchors—as a succession of Greek governments tried to win their support by letting them retire early.
“This is clientelism at its finest,” said Platon Tinios, a professor at the University of Piraeus, near Athens, who studies Greek pensions. “It is a system that’s completely mad.
...
Moreover, the revised list of “arduous” professions still includes many that do not seem arduous enough to warrant early retirement: workers in food retail, for instance, or the fish, cheese and ham industries.”...
... Over the years, this list had grown to include some 600 professions—among them opera singers, hairdressers and television anchors—as a succession of Greek governments tried to win their support by letting them retire early"...
UK suffered GDP drops the first few years after Cameron took over.
Eu growth is much lower than the U.S. since the financial crisis. Why is that? What did they do differently?
Oh they didn't do massive bank bailouts or a fiscal stimulus or monetary stimulus. Trichet kept rates higher than the Fed and no QE until Draghi started it within this past year.
If the EU has growth at all, it's despite austerity, not because of it.
I wouldn't know how to filter the "austerity factor" out. Don't see a cut & dry causation either way.
There are so many differences between US and Europe that direct comparison is difficult. Demographics is one. And then, the US is "too big to fail" to the whole world.... Eu growth is much lower than the U.S. since the financial crisis. Why is that? What did they do differently?