harley
Give me a museum and I'll fill it. (Picasso) Give me a forum ...
I think that it is constitutional based on the commerce clause plus the power to tax to provide for the general welfare.
Well, seeing some of the ways the commerce clause has been used in the past 50 years, you are probably right. As I said, the SCOTUS and I don't agree very much on constitutional interpretations. I keep reading the words in the Bill of Rights, which must be the wrong way to do it. If they can rule that growing pot in your house for your own use is a violation of the interstate commerce act, or that the gov't can take your house and give it to a developer under eminent domain, then they can certainly justify this one.