So if you are on the young side get a High Ded G and once you get older / sicker get a regular G. Seems very hackable.In New York, a person on original Medicare can enroll in a Medigap plan anytime. They can switch Medigap plans anytime.
So if you are on the young side get a High Ded G and once you get older / sicker get a regular G. Seems very hackable.In New York, a person on original Medicare can enroll in a Medigap plan anytime. They can switch Medigap plans anytime.
I haven't started a deep analysis of Medicare yet (63 this month). A question though.... On traditional Medicare, can one buy a supplemental/gap policy that serves as an excess policy of sorts? For example, insurer covers the entire 20% once insured has spent $X0,000 out of pocket.
That would be perfect for us, but based on the rest of the consumer insurance market, I'm guessing that it doesn't exist.
I agree. It would be much simpler to include the Part B deductible in what is covered and increase the premium by $20/month.My only complaint is that Part G does not include the deductible (Like F Did/does). Seems like just an excuse for more paperwork and work for the providers. They should simply add the cost and include it.
And that is why it cost more... adverse selection.So if you are on the young side get a High Ded G and once you get older / sicker get a regular G. Seems very hackable.
So if you are on the young side get a High Ded G and once you get older / sicker get a regular G. Seems very hackable.
+1. Back when I enrolled for a supplement, the annual cost for Plan F was almost exactly the same as Plan G plus the deductible ($233 iirc). So it didn’t make any difference. Since I knew Plan F was being discontinued and on the hope I might have a year with less than $233 in medical expenses I enrolled in Plan G from the start.Well, if Plan G included the deductible like Plan F, it would be called Plan F. It was decided by your and my representatives and Senators that Plan F should be sunsetted. I personally don't agree with the reasoning, but so it is. Sunsetting of Medigap plans has been done before, so it is not new.
If 23% are enrolled in Medigap plans and 48% are enrolled in Medicare Advantage plans, both of which limit exposure to a huge medical bill, doesn't that means that 29% are leaving themselves on the hook for the 20% that Part B doesn't cover, which could be quite large.