lol, sounds like it.
Well, this is one of the problems in talking about personality at such a high level of abstraction. These are very broad categories. When you talk at this level, you lose a lot of resolution and detail. That's an unfortunate downside. Talking in big, broad abstractions makes things simple and easy to digest, but you lose a lot of detail and specificity. And that's where people live -- at the level of specifics, not in broad generalizations. So I think maybe that's why several people are sort of responding, "Yeah, so what. Nothing new to see here."
Each of the Big Five categories has a number of subtraits or subfactors. That's where things get a little more interesting. Here's one list of those subfactors:
Conscientiousness subtraits
Competence/Self-Efficacy
Order
Dutifulness
Achievement-striving
Self-discipline
Deliberation
Neuroticism (Emotional Stability) subtraits
Anxiety
Hostility
Depression
Self-consciousness
Impulsiveness
Vulnerability
Extraversion subtraits
Warmth/Friendliness
Gregariousness
Assertiveness
Activity/Activity level
Excitement-seeking
Positive Emotions/Cheerfulness
Agreeableness subtraits
Trust of others
Compliance/Morality
Altruism
Straightforwardness/Cooperation
Modesty
Tender-mindedness/Sympathy
Openness subtraits
Fantasy/Imagination
Artistic Interests
Feelings/Emotionality
Actions/Adventurousness
Intellect/Like complex problems, philosophical discussion
Values Liberalism
So a high score on one of the Big 5 is made up of your individual scores on the subtraits, but that doesn't mean you're high in all the subtraits. You could be high in some but just average in others (or even low in others). So, for example, your high score in Openness could be due to high scores on subtraits related to artistic interests, valuing feeling and imagination, or liberalism (I'm making that up, I have no idea).
The Big 5 description from the wiki is a broad abstraction that tries to cover all the subtraits, or at least some of them. The nuance is, some of the supposed correlations cited (e.g., between Openness and drug use) are really a reflection of a strong correlation between one or two of the subtraits and that behavior. For instance, with drug use, it's probably the Adventurousness subtrait that is correlated with that, maybe liberalism as well. But the other subtraits (e.g., interest in ideas or art) may have very weak correlations with drug use.
I hope I'm being clear. It gets a little tricky, but the devil is in the details. The overall description I posted from the wiki may over-represent some subtraits and under-represent others. The associations mentioned in the description between a Big 5 Factor and some behavior (e.g., lack of discipline) may be due largely to a correlation with one or two of the subtraits, but not the others. And likewise, you can be high on some of the subtraits, but not on the others. It's at the level of the subtraits where you start to get more precision.