With 50% of the stocks already in a bear market, JP Morgan is calling it a "rolling bear market". Also, have stated that this is a cyclical bear within the secular bull and the bottom should be 2450.
I'm not picking on you, NYEXPAT, but I wonder the significance of this new way of looking at a bear market by looking at individual stocks. As far as I can recall, people talking about bear markets and corrections in the past have always referred to the main indexes.
In a similar vein, I've noticed that the statistics that get reported on varies over time. Sometimes we talk a lot about the Case Shiller housing index, sometimes we don't. Sometimes we talk about the price of a barrel of oil, sometimes we don't. Similarly with the 10 minus 2's, mortgage rates, the yield curve, inflation, the price of gold, the trade deficit, the budget deficit, the value of the dollar against other currencies, etc.
It would make sense if the prominence of the discussions of these various indicators aligned with interesting story lines about, or movements of, these indicators. But the more I watch, the more it seems to be more or less random guessing by the financial talking heads about what might be important soon, and they're not very good guessers.